PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AIVL vs. FVD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AIVL vs. FVD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree U.S. Al Enhanced Value Fund (AIVL) and First Trust Value Line Dividend Index Fund (FVD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AIVL achieves a 14.65% return, which is significantly higher than FVD's 5.31% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with AIVL having a 9.00% annualized return and FVD not far behind at 8.86%.


AIVL

1D
1.99%
1M
3.43%
YTD
14.65%
6M
13.61%
1Y
19.53%
3Y*
15.11%
5Y*
8.42%
10Y*
9.00%

FVD

1D
0.34%
1M
1.01%
YTD
5.31%
6M
4.56%
1Y
11.37%
3Y*
9.20%
5Y*
6.11%
10Y*
8.86%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AIVL vs. FVD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AIVL
WisdomTree U.S. Al Enhanced Value Fund
14.65%9.72%13.49%7.17%-7.26%24.30%-5.82%24.40%-9.57%13.77%
FVD
First Trust Value Line Dividend Index Fund
5.31%8.16%10.04%4.11%-5.18%25.08%-0.02%26.58%-3.49%12.51%

Correlation

The correlation between AIVL and FVD is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.74

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.86

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.89

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 16, 2006

0.91

The correlation between AIVL and FVD shifts across timeframes, from 0.74 (1 year) to 0.91 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

AIVL vs. FVD - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
AIVL
FVD

Technology

21.3%
7.3%

Financial Services

17.9%
19.0%

Industrials

15.5%
14.3%

Healthcare

12.0%
8.2%

Utilities

8.9%
17.4%

Consumer Defensive

7.8%
11.1%

Basic Materials

4.6%
2.9%

Communication Services

4.2%
2.9%

Consumer Cyclical

3.1%
5.7%

Energy

3.1%
3.6%

Real Estate

1.5%
7.7%

Technology

AIVL
21.3%
FVD
7.3%

Financial Services

AIVL
17.9%
FVD
19.0%

Industrials

AIVL
15.5%
FVD
14.3%

Healthcare

AIVL
12.0%
FVD
8.2%

Utilities

AIVL
8.9%
FVD
17.4%

Consumer Defensive

AIVL
7.8%
FVD
11.1%

Basic Materials

AIVL
4.6%
FVD
2.9%

Communication Services

AIVL
4.2%
FVD
2.9%

Consumer Cyclical

AIVL
3.1%
FVD
5.7%

Energy

AIVL
3.1%
FVD
3.6%

Real Estate

AIVL
1.5%
FVD
7.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AIVL vs. FVD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AIVL
AIVL Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
AIVL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AIVL Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
AIVL Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
AIVL Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
AIVL Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank

FVD
FVD Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
FVD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FVD Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
FVD Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
FVD Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
FVD Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AIVL vs. FVD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree U.S. Al Enhanced Value Fund (AIVL) and First Trust Value Line Dividend Index Fund (FVD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AIVLFVDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.48

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.66

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.20

+0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.50

1.58

+0.92

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.06

4.03

+6.03

AIVL vs. FVD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AIVL Sharpe Ratio is 1.67, which is higher than the FVD Sharpe Ratio of 1.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AIVL and FVD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AIVL vs. FVD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AIVL drawdown since its inception was -62.48%, which is greater than FVD's maximum drawdown of -51.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AIVL and FVD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AIVLFVDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-62.48%

-51.00%

-11.48%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.85%

-7.23%

-0.62%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.48%

-11.97%

-2.51%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.08%

-16.41%

-2.67%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.16%

-35.25%

-5.91%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-3.10%

+3.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.89%

-5.44%

-2.45%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.95%

2.83%

-0.88%

Volatility

AIVL vs. FVD - Volatility Comparison

WisdomTree U.S. Al Enhanced Value Fund (AIVL) has a higher volatility of 4.23% compared to First Trust Value Line Dividend Index Fund (FVD) at 3.28%. This indicates that AIVL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FVD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AIVLFVDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.23%

3.28%

+0.95%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.36%

7.13%

+2.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.76%

9.71%

+2.05%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.76%

12.76%

+2.00%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.36%

15.44%

+1.92%

AIVL vs. FVD - Expense Ratio Comparison

AIVL has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is lower than FVD's 0.61% expense ratio.


Dividends

AIVL vs. FVD - Dividend Comparison

AIVL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.47%, less than FVD's 2.86% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AIVL
WisdomTree U.S. Al Enhanced Value Fund
1.47%1.61%2.13%2.43%2.08%2.75%3.55%3.25%4.18%3.16%3.20%3.41%
FVD
First Trust Value Line Dividend Index Fund
2.86%2.36%2.23%2.34%2.20%1.75%2.31%2.03%2.50%2.10%2.04%2.34%

Frequently Asked Questions


AIVL and FVD have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AIVL has higher volatility (4.23%) compared to FVD (3.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AIVL dropped -62.48% vs FVD's -51.00%.

On 10-year performance, AIVL leads with 9.00% vs 8.86% for FVD. On fees, AIVL is cheaper at 0.38% per year. On volatility, FVD has been the lower-risk option at 3.28%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, AIVL has performed better with a 9.00% return vs 8.86%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

AIVL is cheaper with a 0.38% expense ratio, compared with 0.61% for FVD.

FVD has the higher dividend yield at 2.86%, compared with 1.47% for AIVL.

They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for AIVL and 0.61% for FVD.

AIVL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.67 vs 1.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AIVL and FVD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer