PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AIVC vs. LVHD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AIVC vs. LVHD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Amplify Bloomberg AI Value Chain ETF (AIVC) and Franklin U.S. Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF (LVHD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AIVC achieves a 49.41% return, which is significantly higher than LVHD's 14.62% return. Over the past 10 years, AIVC has outperformed LVHD with an annualized return of 14.97%, while LVHD has yielded a comparatively lower 8.26% annualized return.


AIVC

1D
-4.19%
1M
-11.73%
6M
43.18%
YTD
49.41%
1Y
87.08%
3Y*
39.34%
5Y*
15.33%
10Y*
14.97%

LVHD

1D
2.24%
1M
3.49%
6M
10.72%
YTD
14.62%
1Y
16.67%
3Y*
10.97%
5Y*
7.75%
10Y*
8.26%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AIVC vs. LVHD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AIVC
Amplify Bloomberg AI Value Chain ETF
49.41%39.94%18.22%39.28%-38.91%-7.23%41.45%27.78%-18.62%35.42%
LVHD
Franklin U.S. Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF
14.62%7.50%10.18%-0.95%-1.82%26.90%-1.28%22.91%-5.58%14.25%

Correlation

The correlation between AIVC and LVHD is -0.21, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.21

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.05

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.19

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.24

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 9, 2016

0.25

The correlation between AIVC and LVHD shifts across timeframes, from -0.21 (1 year) to 0.25 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

AIVC vs. LVHD - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
AIVC
LVHD

Technology

91.9%
3.1%

Communication Services

4.7%
2.6%

Consumer Cyclical

2.9%
7.4%

Financial Services

0.4%
8.2%

Basic Materials

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

21.8%

Energy

-

7.4%

Healthcare

-

4.4%

Industrials

-

4.9%

Real Estate

-

15.4%

Utilities

-

24.8%

Technology

AIVC
91.9%
LVHD
3.1%

Communication Services

AIVC
4.7%
LVHD
2.6%

Consumer Cyclical

AIVC
2.9%
LVHD
7.4%

Financial Services

AIVC
0.4%
LVHD
8.2%

Basic Materials

AIVC

-

LVHD

-

Consumer Defensive

AIVC

-

LVHD
21.8%

Energy

AIVC

-

LVHD
7.4%

Healthcare

AIVC

-

LVHD
4.4%

Industrials

AIVC

-

LVHD
4.9%

Real Estate

AIVC

-

LVHD
15.4%

Utilities

AIVC

-

LVHD
24.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AIVC vs. LVHD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AIVC
AIVC Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
AIVC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AIVC Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
AIVC Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
AIVC Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
AIVC Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank

LVHD
LVHD Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
LVHD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LVHD Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
LVHD Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
LVHD Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
LVHD Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AIVC vs. LVHD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify Bloomberg AI Value Chain ETF (AIVC) and Franklin U.S. Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF (LVHD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AIVCLVHDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.97

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.53

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.28

+0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.90

2.71

+2.19

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.15

6.72

+9.43

AIVC vs. LVHD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AIVC Sharpe Ratio is 2.58, which is higher than the LVHD Sharpe Ratio of 1.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AIVC and LVHD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AIVC vs. LVHD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AIVC drawdown since its inception was -56.11%, which is greater than LVHD's maximum drawdown of -37.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AIVC and LVHD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AIVCLVHDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.11%

-37.32%

-18.79%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.85%

-6.17%

-11.68%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-32.55%

-14.29%

-18.26%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-53.58%

-16.75%

-36.83%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-56.11%

-37.32%

-18.79%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-17.85%

0.00%

-17.85%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.35%

-4.02%

-12.33%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.41%

2.49%

+2.92%

Volatility

AIVC vs. LVHD - Volatility Comparison

Amplify Bloomberg AI Value Chain ETF (AIVC) has a higher volatility of 12.82% compared to Franklin U.S. Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF (LVHD) at 4.92%. This indicates that AIVC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LVHD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AIVCLVHDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.82%

4.92%

+7.90%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

28.76%

8.10%

+20.66%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

33.92%

10.44%

+23.48%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

31.10%

13.02%

+18.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.33%

15.56%

+11.77%

AIVC vs. LVHD - Expense Ratio Comparison

AIVC has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than LVHD's 0.27% expense ratio.


Dividends

AIVC vs. LVHD - Dividend Comparison

AIVC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.11%, less than LVHD's 3.17% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
AIVC
Amplify Bloomberg AI Value Chain ETF
0.11%0.17%0.21%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.39%1.16%0.38%0.92%0.64%
LVHD
Franklin U.S. Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF
3.17%3.35%4.23%3.55%3.30%2.56%3.27%3.30%3.82%3.33%2.48%

Frequently Asked Questions


AIVC and LVHD have a correlation of -0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AIVC has higher volatility (12.82%) compared to LVHD (4.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AIVC dropped -56.11% vs LVHD's -37.32%.

On 10-year performance, AIVC leads with 14.97% vs 8.26% for LVHD. On fees, LVHD is cheaper at 0.27% per year. On volatility, LVHD has been the lower-risk option at 4.92%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, AIVC has performed better with a 14.97% return vs 8.26%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

LVHD is cheaper with a 0.27% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for AIVC.

LVHD has the higher dividend yield at 3.17%, compared with 0.11% for AIVC.

AIVC is categorized as Technology Equities, while LVHD is Dividend. AIVC tracks Bloomberg AI Value Chain Index, while LVHD tracks Franklin U.S. Low Volatility High Dividend Index. They also come from different issuers: Amplify and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for AIVC and 0.27% for LVHD.

AIVC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.58 vs 1.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AIVC and LVHD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer