PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AIVC vs. SMH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AIVC vs. SMH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Amplify Bloomberg AI Value Chain ETF (AIVC) and VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AIVC achieves a 66.45% return, which is significantly lower than SMH's 72.73% return. Over the past 10 years, AIVC has underperformed SMH with an annualized return of 16.72%, while SMH has yielded a comparatively higher 37.85% annualized return.


AIVC

1D
-4.78%
1M
7.56%
YTD
66.45%
6M
65.87%
1Y
125.43%
3Y*
48.25%
5Y*
16.85%
10Y*
16.72%

SMH

1D
-7.01%
1M
7.93%
YTD
72.73%
6M
71.29%
1Y
138.23%
3Y*
62.28%
5Y*
38.18%
10Y*
37.85%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AIVC vs. SMH - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AIVC
Amplify Bloomberg AI Value Chain ETF
66.45%39.94%18.22%39.28%-38.91%-7.23%41.45%27.78%-18.62%35.42%
SMH
VanEck Semiconductor ETF
72.73%49.17%39.10%73.38%-33.53%42.13%55.53%64.45%-9.05%38.48%

Correlation

The correlation between AIVC and SMH is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.85

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.78

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.77

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.69

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 9, 2016

0.69

The correlation between AIVC and SMH shifts across timeframes, from 0.69 (all time) to 0.85 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

AIVC vs. SMH - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
AIVC
SMH

Technology

91.8%
100.0%

Communication Services

4.8%

-

Consumer Cyclical

2.9%

-

Financial Services

0.4%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Technology

AIVC
91.8%
SMH
100.0%

Communication Services

AIVC
4.8%
SMH

-

Consumer Cyclical

AIVC
2.9%
SMH

-

Financial Services

AIVC
0.4%
SMH

-

Basic Materials

AIVC

-

SMH

-

Consumer Defensive

AIVC

-

SMH

-

Energy

AIVC

-

SMH

-

Healthcare

AIVC

-

SMH

-

Industrials

AIVC

-

SMH

-

Real Estate

AIVC

-

SMH

-

Utilities

AIVC

-

SMH

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AIVC vs. SMH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AIVC
AIVC Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
AIVC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AIVC Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
AIVC Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
AIVC Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
AIVC Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank

SMH
SMH Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
SMH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SMH Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
SMH Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
SMH Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
SMH Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AIVC vs. SMH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify Bloomberg AI Value Chain ETF (AIVC) and VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AIVCSMHDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.08

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.01

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.55

1.58

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

8.94

9.31

-0.37

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

27.60

33.88

-6.28

AIVC vs. SMH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AIVC Sharpe Ratio is 3.91, which is comparable to the SMH Sharpe Ratio of 3.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AIVC and SMH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AIVC vs. SMH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AIVC drawdown since its inception was -56.11%, smaller than the maximum SMH drawdown of -84.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AIVC and SMH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AIVCSMHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.11%

-84.96%

+28.85%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.11%

-14.93%

+0.82%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-32.55%

-35.74%

+3.19%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-53.58%

-45.30%

-8.28%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-56.11%

-45.30%

-10.81%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.48%

-7.01%

-1.47%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.38%

-41.01%

+24.63%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.56%

4.10%

+0.46%

Volatility

AIVC vs. SMH - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Amplify Bloomberg AI Value Chain ETF (AIVC) is 15.81%, while VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) has a volatility of 19.08%. This indicates that AIVC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SMH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AIVCSMHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

15.81%

19.08%

-3.27%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

26.60%

29.18%

-2.58%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

32.28%

34.87%

-2.59%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

30.73%

35.83%

-5.10%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.16%

32.97%

-5.81%

AIVC vs. SMH - Expense Ratio Comparison

AIVC has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than SMH's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

AIVC vs. SMH - Dividend Comparison

AIVC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.10%, less than SMH's 0.18% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AIVC
Amplify Bloomberg AI Value Chain ETF
0.10%0.17%0.21%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.39%1.16%0.38%0.92%0.64%0.00%
SMH
VanEck Semiconductor ETF
0.18%0.31%0.44%0.60%1.18%0.51%0.69%1.50%1.88%1.43%0.80%2.14%

Frequently Asked Questions


AIVC and SMH have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SMH has higher volatility (19.08%) compared to AIVC (15.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AIVC dropped -56.11% vs SMH's -84.96%.

On 10-year performance, SMH leads with 37.85% vs 16.72% for AIVC. On fees, SMH is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, AIVC has been the lower-risk option at 15.81%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SMH has performed better with a 37.85% return vs 16.72%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SMH is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for AIVC.

SMH has the higher dividend yield at 0.18%, compared with 0.10% for AIVC.

AIVC is categorized as Technology Equities, while SMH is Semiconductors. AIVC tracks Bloomberg AI Value Chain Index, while SMH tracks MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index. They also come from different issuers: Amplify and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for AIVC and 0.35% for SMH.

SMH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.99 vs 3.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AIVC and SMH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer