AIVC vs. GXPT

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

AIVC (Amplify Bloomberg AI Value Chain ETF) and GXPT (Global X PureCap MSCI Information Technology ETF) are both Technology Equities funds - AIVC tracks the Bloomberg AI Value Chain Index while GXPT tracks the MSCI USA Information Technology PureCap Index. Both are passively managed. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. AIVC charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for GXPT.

Performance

AIVC vs. GXPT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Amplify Bloomberg AI Value Chain ETF (AIVC) and Global X PureCap MSCI Information Technology ETF (GXPT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AIVC achieves a 66.45% return, which is significantly higher than GXPT's 21.02% return.

AIVC

• 1D: -4.78%
• 1M: 7.56%
• YTD: 66.45%
• 6M: 65.87%
• 1Y: 125.43%
• 3Y*: 48.25%
• 5Y*: 16.85%
• 10Y*: 16.72%

GXPT

• 1D: -0.12%
• 1M: 2.57%
• YTD: 21.02%
• 6M: 20.73%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AIVC vs. GXPT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
AIVC Amplify Bloomberg AI Value Chain ETF	66.45%	25.13%
GXPT Global X PureCap MSCI Information Technology ETF	21.02%	11.47%

Correlation

The correlation between AIVC and GXPT is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 23, 2025	0.86

Return for Risk

AIVC vs. GXPT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AIVC

AIVC Risk / Return Rank: 94
AIVC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
AIVC Sortino Ratio Rank: 91
AIVC Omega Ratio Rank: 91
AIVC Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
AIVC Martin Ratio Rank: 95

GXPT

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AIVC vs. GXPT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify Bloomberg AI Value Chain ETF (AIVC) and Global X PureCap MSCI Information Technology ETF (GXPT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	AIVC	GXPT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.91	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.06	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.55	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	8.94	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	27.60	—	—

Drawdowns

AIVC vs. GXPT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AIVC drawdown since its inception was -56.11%, which is greater than GXPT's maximum drawdown of -18.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AIVC and GXPT.

Drawdown Indicators

	AIVC	GXPT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-56.11%	-18.74%	-37.37%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.11%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-32.55%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-53.58%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-56.11%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-8.48%	-5.47%	-3.01%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-16.38%	-5.03%	-11.35%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.56%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	AIVC	GXPT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	15.81%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	26.60%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	32.28%	22.66%	+9.62%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	30.73%	22.66%	+8.07%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	27.16%	22.66%	+4.50%

AIVC vs. GXPT - Expense Ratio Comparison

AIVC has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than GXPT's 0.15% expense ratio.

Dividends

AIVC vs. GXPT - Dividend Comparison

AIVC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.10%, less than GXPT's 0.11% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
AIVC Amplify Bloomberg AI Value Chain ETF	0.10%	0.17%	0.21%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.39%	1.16%	0.38%	0.92%	0.64%
GXPT Global X PureCap MSCI Information Technology ETF	0.11%	0.14%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AIVC and GXPT in my portfolio?

AIVC and GXPT have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, AIVC or GXPT?

On fees, GXPT is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, AIVC or GXPT?

GXPT is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for AIVC.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, AIVC or GXPT?

GXPT has the higher dividend yield at 0.11%, compared with 0.10% for AIVC.

What is the main difference between AIVC and GXPT?

AIVC tracks Bloomberg AI Value Chain Index, while GXPT tracks MSCI USA Information Technology PureCap Index. They also come from different issuers: Amplify and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for AIVC and 0.15% for GXPT.