AIGA.L vs. ET
AIGA.L (WisdomTree Agriculture) is Agricultural Commodities fund tracking the Bloomberg Agriculture, while ET (Energy Transfer LP) is a stock. Over the past 10 years, AIGA.L returned 0.03%/yr vs 13.14%/yr for ET. At a 0.13 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
AIGA.L vs. ET - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AIGA.L achieves a 2.21% return, which is significantly lower than ET's 19.85% return. Over the past 10 years, AIGA.L has underperformed ET with an annualized return of 0.03%, while ET has yielded a comparatively higher 13.14% annualized return.
AIGA.L
- 1D
- -0.17%
- 1M
- -5.79%
- YTD
- 2.21%
- 6M
- -0.00%
- 1Y
- -1.31%
- 3Y*
- -3.46%
- 5Y*
- 0.70%
- 10Y*
- 0.03%
ET
- 1D
- 1.65%
- 1M
- -5.36%
- YTD
- 19.85%
- 6M
- 19.34%
- 1Y
- 12.14%
- 3Y*
- 24.04%
- 5Y*
- 20.15%
- 10Y*
- 13.14%
AIGA.L vs. ET - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AIGA.L WisdomTree Agriculture | 2.21% | -2.00% | -6.82% | -4.27% | 13.91% | 25.62% | 14.26% | 0.00% | -17.58% | 0.00% |
ET Energy Transfer LP | 19.85% | -9.37% | 53.87% | 27.87% | 55.74% | 42.96% | -44.92% | 5.88% | -17.74% | -4.66% |
Correlation
The correlation between AIGA.L and ET is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2008 | 0.13 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AIGA.L vs. ET — Risk / Return Rank
AIGA.L
ET
AIGA.L vs. ET - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Agriculture (AIGA.L) and Energy Transfer LP (ET). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AIGA.L | ET | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.70 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.05 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.01 | 1.13 | -0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.02 | 1.22 | -1.20 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.04 | 2.70 | -2.66 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AIGA.L vs. ET - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AIGA.L drawdown since its inception was -67.98%, smaller than the maximum ET drawdown of -87.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AIGA.L and ET.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AIGA.L | ET | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -67.98% | -87.81% | +19.83% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.42% | -9.38% | -1.04% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.75% | -24.56% | +0.81% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.61% | -25.82% | -2.79% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.38% | -72.82% | +29.44% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -43.26% | -6.47% | -36.79% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -41.31% | -25.72% | -15.59% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.52% | 4.65% | -0.13% |
Volatility
AIGA.L vs. ET - Volatility Comparison
WisdomTree Agriculture (AIGA.L) and Energy Transfer LP (ET) have volatilities of 5.27% and 5.08%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AIGA.L | ET | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.27% | 5.08% | +0.19% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.23% | 12.03% | -1.80% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.53% | 16.13% | -2.60% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.74% | 24.86% | -8.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.29% | 34.99% | -6.70% |
Dividends
AIGA.L vs. ET - Dividend Comparison
AIGA.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ET's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.00%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AIGA.L WisdomTree Agriculture | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ET Energy Transfer LP | 7.00% | 7.97% | 6.51% | 8.95% | 7.33% | 7.41% | 17.27% | 9.51% | 9.24% | 6.66% | 5.90% | 7.42% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AIGA.L and ET have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for AIGA.L and ET
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer