PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AIEQ vs. HACK
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

AIEQ vs. HACK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AI Powered Equity ETF (AIEQ) and ETFMG Prime Cyber Security ETF (HACK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

AIEQ vs. HACK - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
AIEQ
AI Powered Equity ETF
-3.53%13.96%14.21%
HACK
ETFMG Prime Cyber Security ETF
-5.23%7.97%16.16%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AIEQ achieves a -3.53% return, which is significantly higher than HACK's -5.23% return.


AIEQ

1D
0.73%
1M
-4.56%
YTD
-3.53%
6M
-2.63%
1Y
17.02%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

HACK

1D
1.44%
1M
1.98%
YTD
-5.23%
6M
-12.47%
1Y
5.34%
3Y*
16.96%
5Y*
6.67%
10Y*
12.73%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


AIEQ vs. HACK - Expense Ratio Comparison

AIEQ has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than HACK's 0.60% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

AIEQ vs. HACK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AIEQ
AIEQ Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
AIEQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AIEQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
AIEQ Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
AIEQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
AIEQ Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank

HACK
HACK Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
HACK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HACK Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
HACK Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
HACK Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
HACK Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AIEQ vs. HACK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AI Powered Equity ETF (AIEQ) and ETFMG Prime Cyber Security ETF (HACK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AIEQHACKDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.79

0.21

+0.59

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.28

0.47

+0.81

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.06

+0.14

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.21

0.30

+0.92

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.89

0.79

+5.10

AIEQ vs. HACK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AIEQ Sharpe Ratio is 0.79, which is higher than the HACK Sharpe Ratio of 0.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AIEQ and HACK, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AIEQHACKDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.79

0.21

+0.59

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.29

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.56

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.56

0.47

+0.09

Correlation

The correlation between AIEQ and HACK is 0.70, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

AIEQ vs. HACK - Dividend Comparison

AIEQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.45%, more than HACK's 0.08% yield.


TTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
AIEQ
AI Powered Equity ETF
0.45%0.43%0.65%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
HACK
ETFMG Prime Cyber Security ETF
0.08%0.07%0.14%0.20%0.24%0.26%1.11%0.14%0.09%0.01%1.23%

Drawdowns

AIEQ vs. HACK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AIEQ drawdown since its inception was -24.19%, smaller than the maximum HACK drawdown of -42.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AIEQ and HACK.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


AIEQHACKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.19%

-42.68%

+18.49%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.35%

-20.67%

+5.32%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.68%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.68%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.85%

-14.52%

+8.67%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.50%

-11.70%

+8.20%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.17%

7.81%

-4.64%

Volatility

AIEQ vs. HACK - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for AI Powered Equity ETF (AIEQ) is 5.35%, while ETFMG Prime Cyber Security ETF (HACK) has a volatility of 8.14%. This indicates that AIEQ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HACK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


AIEQHACKDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.35%

8.14%

-2.79%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.76%

17.10%

-7.34%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.59%

26.04%

-4.45%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.93%

23.31%

-3.38%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.93%

22.85%

-2.92%