AHLT vs. SDMF
AHLT (American Beacon AHL Trend ETF) and SDMF (Simplify DBi CTA Managed Futures Index ETF) are both Systematic Trend funds. AHLT is actively managed, while SDMF is passively managed. A 0.71 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. AHLT charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for SDMF.
Performance
AHLT vs. SDMF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
AHLT
- 1D
- 0.37%
- 1M
- 3.10%
- YTD
- 12.65%
- 6M
- 16.87%
- 1Y
- 37.17%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SDMF
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 2.56%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AHLT vs. SDMF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
AHLT American Beacon AHL Trend ETF | 4.00% |
SDMF Simplify DBi CTA Managed Futures Index ETF | 3.28% |
Correlation
The correlation between AHLT and SDMF is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 20, 2026 | 0.71 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AHLT vs. SDMF — Risk / Return Rank
AHLT
SDMF
AHLT vs. SDMF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Beacon AHL Trend ETF (AHLT) and Simplify DBi CTA Managed Futures Index ETF (SDMF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AHLT | SDMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.18 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.78 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.77 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.90 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AHLT | SDMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.18 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.48 | 0.91 | -0.43 |
Drawdowns
AHLT vs. SDMF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AHLT drawdown since its inception was -20.18%, which is greater than SDMF's maximum drawdown of -6.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AHLT and SDMF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AHLT | SDMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.18% | -6.23% | -13.95% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.26% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.60% | 0.00% | -0.60% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.41% | -2.29% | -7.12% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.05% | — | — |
Volatility
AHLT vs. SDMF - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AHLT | SDMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.60% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.12% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.16% | 13.36% | +3.80% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.38% | 13.36% | +4.02% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.38% | 13.36% | +4.02% |
AHLT vs. SDMF - Expense Ratio Comparison
AHLT has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than SDMF's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
AHLT vs. SDMF - Dividend Comparison
AHLT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.51%, while SDMF has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
AHLT American Beacon AHL Trend ETF | 1.51% | 1.70% | 0.00% | 3.72% |
SDMF Simplify DBi CTA Managed Futures Index ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AHLT and SDMF have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SDMF is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SDMF is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for AHLT.
AHLT has the higher dividend yield at 1.51%, compared with 0.00% for SDMF.
They also come from different issuers: American Beacon and Simplify. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for AHLT and 0.35% for SDMF.
Find the right allocation for AHLT and SDMF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer