AHLT vs. MFTNX
AHLT (American Beacon AHL Trend ETF) and MFTNX (Arrow Managed Futures Strategy Fund Institutional Class) are both Systematic Trend funds. Over the past year, AHLT returned 37.17% vs 44.95% for MFTNX. A 0.66 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. AHLT charges 0.95%/yr vs 1.56%/yr for MFTNX.
Performance
AHLT vs. MFTNX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AHLT achieves a 12.65% return, which is significantly lower than MFTNX's 16.93% return.
AHLT
- 1D
- 0.37%
- 1M
- 3.10%
- YTD
- 12.65%
- 6M
- 16.87%
- 1Y
- 37.17%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MFTNX
- 1D
- 2.38%
- 1M
- 3.39%
- YTD
- 16.93%
- 6M
- 24.28%
- 1Y
- 44.95%
- 3Y*
- 5.63%
- 5Y*
- 10.74%
- 10Y*
- 6.49%
AHLT vs. MFTNX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
AHLT American Beacon AHL Trend ETF | 12.65% | 13.73% | 6.08% | -8.33% |
MFTNX Arrow Managed Futures Strategy Fund Institutional Class | 16.93% | 9.44% | 7.12% | -15.27% |
Correlation
The correlation between AHLT and MFTNX is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 1, 2023 | 0.66 |
The correlation between AHLT and MFTNX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.66 to 0.75 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AHLT vs. MFTNX — Risk / Return Rank
AHLT
MFTNX
AHLT vs. MFTNX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Beacon AHL Trend ETF (AHLT) and Arrow Managed Futures Strategy Fund Institutional Class (MFTNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AHLT | MFTNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.18 | 2.28 | -0.09 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.78 | 2.93 | -0.15 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | 1.39 | 0.00 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.77 | 4.65 | +0.12 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.90 | 13.04 | -0.14 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AHLT | MFTNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.18 | 2.28 | -0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.49 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.30 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.48 | 0.24 | +0.25 |
Drawdowns
AHLT vs. MFTNX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AHLT drawdown since its inception was -20.18%, smaller than the maximum MFTNX drawdown of -35.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AHLT and MFTNX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AHLT | MFTNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.18% | -35.58% | +15.40% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.26% | -9.74% | +1.48% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -32.45% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -32.45% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.58% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.60% | -0.54% | -0.06% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.41% | -12.91% | +3.50% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.05% | 3.47% | -0.42% |
Volatility
AHLT vs. MFTNX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for American Beacon AHL Trend ETF (AHLT) is 2.60%, while Arrow Managed Futures Strategy Fund Institutional Class (MFTNX) has a volatility of 4.10%. This indicates that AHLT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MFTNX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AHLT | MFTNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.60% | 4.10% | -1.50% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.12% | 12.37% | -0.25% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.16% | 19.73% | -2.57% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.38% | 21.98% | -4.60% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.38% | 22.09% | -4.71% |
AHLT vs. MFTNX - Expense Ratio Comparison
AHLT has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than MFTNX's 1.56% expense ratio.
Dividends
AHLT vs. MFTNX - Dividend Comparison
AHLT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.51%, while MFTNX has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AHLT American Beacon AHL Trend ETF | 1.51% | 1.70% | 0.00% | 3.72% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MFTNX Arrow Managed Futures Strategy Fund Institutional Class | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 11.69% | 40.52% | 2.53% | 0.00% | 20.10% | 8.43% | 2.28% | 9.35% | 1.46% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AHLT and MFTNX have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MFTNX has higher volatility (4.10%) compared to AHLT (2.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AHLT dropped -20.18% vs MFTNX's -35.58%.
MFTNX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.28 vs 2.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AHLT and MFTNX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer