SDMF vs. CTA
SDMF (Simplify DBi CTA Managed Futures Index ETF) and CTA (Simplify Managed Futures Strategy ETF) are both Systematic Trend funds from Simplify. SDMF is passively managed, while CTA is actively managed. A 0.53 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SDMF charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.78%/yr for CTA.
Performance
SDMF vs. CTA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
SDMF
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 2.56%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CTA
- 1D
- 0.54%
- 1M
- -6.72%
- YTD
- 11.70%
- 6M
- 12.40%
- 1Y
- 15.29%
- 3Y*
- 11.59%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SDMF vs. CTA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
SDMF Simplify DBi CTA Managed Futures Index ETF | 3.28% |
CTA Simplify Managed Futures Strategy ETF | 1.92% |
Correlation
The correlation between SDMF and CTA is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 20, 2026 | 0.53 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SDMF vs. CTA — Risk / Return Rank
SDMF
CTA
SDMF vs. CTA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Simplify DBi CTA Managed Futures Index ETF (SDMF) and Simplify Managed Futures Strategy ETF (CTA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SDMF | CTA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 0.76 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.91 | 0.61 | +0.31 |
Drawdowns
SDMF vs. CTA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SDMF drawdown since its inception was -6.23%, smaller than the maximum CTA drawdown of -18.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SDMF and CTA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SDMF | CTA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -6.23% | -18.07% | +11.84% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -11.00% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -11.23% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -8.35% | +8.35% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.29% | -5.67% | +3.38% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 4.16% | — |
Volatility
SDMF vs. CTA - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SDMF | CTA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 8.01% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 17.30% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.36% | 20.12% | -6.76% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.36% | 16.59% | -3.23% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.36% | 16.59% | -3.23% |
SDMF vs. CTA - Expense Ratio Comparison
SDMF has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than CTA's 0.78% expense ratio.
Dividends
SDMF vs. CTA - Dividend Comparison
SDMF has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CTA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.88%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CTA Simplify Managed Futures Strategy ETF | 4.88% | 3.19% | 4.80% | 7.78% | 6.58% |
SDMF Simplify DBi CTA Managed Futures Index ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SDMF and CTA have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SDMF is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SDMF is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.78% for CTA.
CTA has the higher dividend yield at 4.88%, compared with 0.00% for SDMF.
Their fees differ too: 0.35% for SDMF and 0.78% for CTA.
Find the right allocation for SDMF and CTA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer