AHLT vs. RSST

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about American Beacon AHL Trend ETF (AHLT) and Return Stacked U.S. Stocks & Managed Futures ETF (RSST).

AHLT and RSST are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. AHLT is an actively managed fund by American Beacon. It was launched on Aug 30, 2023. RSST is an actively managed fund by Return Stacked. It was launched on Sep 5, 2023.

Performance

AHLT vs. RSST - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Beacon AHL Trend ETF (AHLT) and Return Stacked U.S. Stocks & Managed Futures ETF (RSST). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

AHLT vs. RSST - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
AHLT American Beacon AHL Trend ETF	7.41%	13.73%	6.08%	-11.12%
RSST Return Stacked U.S. Stocks & Managed Futures ETF	0.81%	19.91%	18.37%	1.56%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AHLT achieves a 7.41% return, which is significantly higher than RSST's 0.81% return.

AHLT

• 1D: 0.12%
• 1M: -3.25%
• YTD: 7.41%
• 6M: 17.23%
• 1Y: 23.17%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

RSST

• 1D: 1.06%
• 1M: -6.60%
• YTD: 0.81%
• 6M: 7.64%
• 1Y: 30.72%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AHLT vs. RSST - Expense Ratio Comparison

AHLT has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than RSST's 1.04% expense ratio.

RSST

Return Stacked U.S. Stocks & Managed Futures ETF

AHLT

American Beacon AHL Trend ETF

Return for Risk

AHLT vs. RSST — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AHLT

AHLT Risk / Return Rank: 64
AHLT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 69
AHLT Sortino Ratio Rank: 65
AHLT Omega Ratio Rank: 60
AHLT Calmar Ratio Rank: 80
AHLT Martin Ratio Rank: 49

RSST

RSST Risk / Return Rank: 60
RSST Sharpe Ratio Rank: 60
RSST Sortino Ratio Rank: 57
RSST Omega Ratio Rank: 59
RSST Calmar Ratio Rank: 61
RSST Martin Ratio Rank: 63

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AHLT vs. RSST - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Beacon AHL Trend ETF (AHLT) and Return Stacked U.S. Stocks & Managed Futures ETF (RSST). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	AHLT	RSST	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.26	1.10	+0.16
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.69	1.52	+0.17
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.23	1.22	+0.01
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.39	1.62	+0.77
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	5.07	6.55	-1.49
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

AHLT vs. RSST - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AHLT Sharpe Ratio is 1.26, which is comparable to the RSST Sharpe Ratio of 1.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AHLT and RSST, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	AHLT	RSST	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.26	1.10	+0.16
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.39	0.64	-0.25

Correlation

The correlation between AHLT and RSST is 0.70, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

AHLT vs. RSST - Dividend Comparison

AHLT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.58%, more than RSST's 1.11% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023
AHLT American Beacon AHL Trend ETF	1.58%	1.70%	0.00%	3.72%
RSST Return Stacked U.S. Stocks & Managed Futures ETF	1.11%	1.12%	0.09%	0.93%

Drawdowns

AHLT vs. RSST - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AHLT drawdown since its inception was -20.18%, smaller than the maximum RSST drawdown of -30.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AHLT and RSST.

Drawdown Indicators

	AHLT	RSST	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-20.18%	-30.80%	+10.62%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.39%	-19.03%	+9.64%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.84%	-8.07%	+3.23%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.84%	-6.34%	-3.50%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.43%	4.70%	-0.27%

Volatility

AHLT vs. RSST - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for American Beacon AHL Trend ETF (AHLT) is 3.54%, while Return Stacked U.S. Stocks & Managed Futures ETF (RSST) has a volatility of 6.67%. This indicates that AHLT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RSST based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AHLT	RSST	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.54%	6.67%	-3.13%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.81%	18.51%	-3.70%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.50%	28.18%	-9.68%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.78%	24.70%	-6.92%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.78%	24.70%	-6.92%