PortfoliosLab logo
AHLT vs. RSST
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between AHLT and RSST is 0.30, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

AHLT vs. RSST - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Beacon AHL Trend ETF (AHLT) and Return Stacked U.S. Stocks & Managed Futures ETF (RSST). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

AHLT:

-0.99

RSST:

-0.31

Sortino Ratio

AHLT:

-1.15

RSST:

-0.25

Omega Ratio

AHLT:

0.86

RSST:

0.97

Calmar Ratio

AHLT:

-0.78

RSST:

-0.29

Martin Ratio

AHLT:

-1.29

RSST:

-0.76

Ulcer Index

AHLT:

12.17%

RSST:

11.85%

Daily Std Dev

AHLT:

17.30%

RSST:

28.64%

Max Drawdown

AHLT:

-20.18%

RSST:

-30.80%

Current Drawdown

AHLT:

-18.16%

RSST:

-16.37%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AHLT achieves a -7.78% return, which is significantly higher than RSST's -8.37% return.


AHLT

YTD

-7.78%

1M

-0.50%

6M

-2.61%

1Y

-17.03%

3Y*

N/A

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

RSST

YTD

-8.37%

1M

5.80%

6M

-7.94%

1Y

-8.85%

3Y*

N/A

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


AHLT vs. RSST - Expense Ratio Comparison

AHLT has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than RSST's 1.04% expense ratio.


Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

AHLT vs. RSST — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AHLT
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of AHLT is 11
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of AHLT is 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of AHLT is 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of AHLT is 11
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of AHLT is 00
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of AHLT is 22
Martin Ratio Rank

RSST
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of RSST is 77
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of RSST is 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of RSST is 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of RSST is 77
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of RSST is 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of RSST is 77
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

AHLT vs. RSST - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Beacon AHL Trend ETF (AHLT) and Return Stacked U.S. Stocks & Managed Futures ETF (RSST). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current AHLT Sharpe Ratio is -0.99, which is lower than the RSST Sharpe Ratio of -0.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AHLT and RSST, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

AHLT vs. RSST - Dividend Comparison

AHLT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while RSST's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.11%.


Drawdowns

AHLT vs. RSST - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AHLT drawdown since its inception was -20.18%, smaller than the maximum RSST drawdown of -30.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AHLT and RSST.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

AHLT vs. RSST - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for American Beacon AHL Trend ETF (AHLT) is 3.76%, while Return Stacked U.S. Stocks & Managed Futures ETF (RSST) has a volatility of 4.66%. This indicates that AHLT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RSST based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...