AHLT vs. AHLPX
AHLT (American Beacon AHL Trend ETF) and AHLPX (American Beacon AHL Managed Futures Strategy Fund) are both Systematic Trend funds from American Beacon. Over the past year, AHLT returned 37.17% vs 30.16% for AHLPX. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. AHLT charges 0.95%/yr vs 1.83%/yr for AHLPX.
Performance
AHLT vs. AHLPX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with AHLT having a 12.65% return and AHLPX slightly lower at 12.12%.
AHLT
- 1D
- 0.37%
- 1M
- 3.10%
- YTD
- 12.65%
- 6M
- 16.87%
- 1Y
- 37.17%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AHLPX
- 1D
- 1.06%
- 1M
- 2.65%
- YTD
- 12.12%
- 6M
- 14.81%
- 1Y
- 30.16%
- 3Y*
- 4.50%
- 5Y*
- 4.30%
- 10Y*
- 4.71%
AHLT vs. AHLPX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
AHLT American Beacon AHL Trend ETF | 12.65% | 13.73% | 6.08% | -8.33% |
AHLPX American Beacon AHL Managed Futures Strategy Fund | 12.12% | 2.19% | 1.74% | 1.36% |
Correlation
The correlation between AHLT and AHLPX is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 1, 2023 | 0.77 |
The correlation between AHLT and AHLPX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AHLT vs. AHLPX — Risk / Return Rank
AHLT
AHLPX
AHLT vs. AHLPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Beacon AHL Trend ETF (AHLT) and American Beacon AHL Managed Futures Strategy Fund (AHLPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AHLT | AHLPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.18 | 2.88 | -0.70 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.78 | 3.88 | -1.11 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | 1.52 | -0.13 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.77 | 6.07 | -1.30 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.90 | 19.40 | -6.50 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AHLT | AHLPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.18 | 2.88 | -0.70 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.45 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.50 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.48 | 0.42 | +0.06 |
Drawdowns
AHLT vs. AHLPX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AHLT drawdown since its inception was -20.18%, smaller than the maximum AHLPX drawdown of -21.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AHLT and AHLPX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AHLT | AHLPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.18% | -21.90% | +1.72% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.26% | -5.02% | -3.24% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -21.90% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -21.90% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -21.90% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.60% | -0.29% | -0.31% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.41% | -6.78% | -2.63% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.05% | 1.57% | +1.48% |
Volatility
AHLT vs. AHLPX - Volatility Comparison
American Beacon AHL Trend ETF (AHLT) has a higher volatility of 2.60% compared to American Beacon AHL Managed Futures Strategy Fund (AHLPX) at 2.31%. This indicates that AHLT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AHLPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AHLT | AHLPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.60% | 2.31% | +0.29% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.12% | 7.62% | +4.50% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.16% | 10.86% | +6.30% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.38% | 9.66% | +7.72% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.38% | 9.51% | +7.87% |
AHLT vs. AHLPX - Expense Ratio Comparison
AHLT has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than AHLPX's 1.83% expense ratio.
Dividends
AHLT vs. AHLPX - Dividend Comparison
AHLT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.51%, less than AHLPX's 7.20% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AHLPX American Beacon AHL Managed Futures Strategy Fund | 7.20% | 8.07% | 0.29% | 0.63% | 17.64% | 7.15% | 5.14% | 4.17% | 1.45% | 4.07% | 0.00% | 3.40% |
AHLT American Beacon AHL Trend ETF | 1.51% | 1.70% | 0.00% | 3.72% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AHLT and AHLPX have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AHLT has higher volatility (2.60%) compared to AHLPX (2.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AHLT dropped -20.18% vs AHLPX's -21.90%.
AHLPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.88 vs 2.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AHLT and AHLPX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer