SDMF vs. DBMF

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

SDMF (Simplify DBi CTA Managed Futures Index ETF) and DBMF (iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF) are both Systematic Trend funds. SDMF is passively managed, while DBMF is actively managed. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SDMF charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for DBMF.

Performance

SDMF vs. DBMF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Simplify DBi CTA Managed Futures Index ETF (SDMF) and iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF (DBMF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

SDMF

• 1D: -1.31%
• 1M: -1.80%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

DBMF

• 1D: -1.26%
• 1M: -1.67%
• YTD: 9.37%
• 6M: 8.47%
• 1Y: 26.10%
• 3Y*: 8.78%
• 5Y*: 7.97%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SDMF vs. DBMF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
SDMF Simplify DBi CTA Managed Futures Index ETF	0.56%
DBMF iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF	0.46%

Correlation

The correlation between SDMF and DBMF is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 19, 2026	0.87

Return for Risk

SDMF vs. DBMF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SDMF

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

DBMF

DBMF Risk / Return Rank: 74
DBMF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 67
DBMF Sortino Ratio Rank: 61
DBMF Omega Ratio Rank: 78
DBMF Calmar Ratio Rank: 83
DBMF Martin Ratio Rank: 80

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SDMF vs. DBMF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Simplify DBi CTA Managed Futures Index ETF (SDMF) and iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF (DBMF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SDMF	DBMF	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	2.10	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	2.77	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.44	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	4.30	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	15.28	—

Drawdowns

SDMF vs. DBMF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SDMF drawdown since its inception was -6.23%, smaller than the maximum DBMF drawdown of -20.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SDMF and DBMF.

Drawdown Indicators

	SDMF	DBMF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-6.23%	-20.39%	+14.16%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-6.10%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-15.60%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-20.39%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.72%	-2.71%	-0.01%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.18%	-6.55%	+4.37%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	1.71%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	SDMF	DBMF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	3.11%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	10.14%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.16%	12.47%	+0.69%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.16%	12.53%	+0.63%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.16%	12.41%	+0.75%

SDMF vs. DBMF - Expense Ratio Comparison

SDMF has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than DBMF's 0.85% expense ratio.

Dividends

SDMF vs. DBMF - Dividend Comparison

SDMF has not paid dividends to shareholders, while DBMF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.23%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
DBMF iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF	5.23%	5.91%	5.75%	2.91%	7.72%	10.38%	0.86%	9.35%
SDMF Simplify DBi CTA Managed Futures Index ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SDMF and DBMF in my portfolio?

SDMF and DBMF have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, SDMF or DBMF?

On fees, SDMF is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, SDMF or DBMF?

SDMF is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for DBMF.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SDMF or DBMF?

DBMF has the higher dividend yield at 5.23%, compared with 0.00% for SDMF.

What is the main difference between SDMF and DBMF?

They also come from different issuers: Simplify and iM Global Partners. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for SDMF and 0.85% for DBMF.