SDMF vs. MFUT
Compare and contrast key facts about Simplify DBi CTA Managed Futures Index ETF (SDMF) and Cambria Chesapeake Pure Trend ETF (MFUT).
SDMF and MFUT are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. SDMF is a passively managed fund by Simplify that tracks the performance of the DBi CTA Managed Futures Index. It was launched on Feb 17, 2026. MFUT is an actively managed fund by Cambria. It was launched on May 28, 2024.
Performance
SDMF vs. MFUT - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
SDMF vs. MFUT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
SDMF Simplify DBi CTA Managed Futures Index ETF | 0.11% |
MFUT Cambria Chesapeake Pure Trend ETF | -1.21% |
Returns By Period
SDMF
- 1D
- 1.07%
- 1M
- -2.92%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MFUT
- 1D
- 0.92%
- 1M
- -3.38%
- YTD
- 7.52%
- 6M
- 13.12%
- 1Y
- 12.86%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SDMF vs. MFUT - Expense Ratio Comparison
SDMF has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than MFUT's 1.18% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
SDMF vs. MFUT — Risk / Return Rank
SDMF
MFUT
SDMF vs. MFUT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Simplify DBi CTA Managed Futures Index ETF (SDMF) and Cambria Chesapeake Pure Trend ETF (MFUT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SDMF | MFUT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 0.85 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.05 | -0.50 | +0.56 |
Correlation
The correlation between SDMF and MFUT is 0.48, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
SDMF vs. MFUT - Dividend Comparison
Neither SDMF nor MFUT has paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
SDMF Simplify DBi CTA Managed Futures Index ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MFUT Cambria Chesapeake Pure Trend ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.33% |
Drawdowns
SDMF vs. MFUT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SDMF drawdown since its inception was -6.23%, smaller than the maximum MFUT drawdown of -29.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SDMF and MFUT.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| SDMF | MFUT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -6.23% | -29.28% | +23.05% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -9.43% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.92% | -12.06% | +9.14% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.66% | -17.71% | +15.05% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 4.98% | — |
Volatility
SDMF vs. MFUT - Volatility Comparison
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| SDMF | MFUT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 4.82% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 13.03% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.56% | 15.17% | +3.39% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.56% | 13.54% | +5.02% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.56% | 13.54% | +5.02% |