AHLT vs. JPFP
AHLT (American Beacon AHL Trend ETF) and JPFP (JPMorgan Managed Futures Plus ETF) are both Systematic Trend funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. AHLT charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for JPFP.
Performance
AHLT vs. JPFP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
AHLT
- 1D
- 0.75%
- 1M
- 0.46%
- 6M
- 2.98%
- YTD
- 10.08%
- 1Y
- 28.82%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
JPFP
- 1D
- -0.73%
- 1M
- 0.40%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AHLT vs. JPFP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
AHLT American Beacon AHL Trend ETF | -0.91% |
JPFP JPMorgan Managed Futures Plus ETF | -1.44% |
Correlation
The correlation between AHLT and JPFP is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 28, 2026 | 0.74 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AHLT vs. JPFP — Risk / Return Rank
AHLT
JPFP
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
AHLT vs. JPFP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Beacon AHL Trend ETF (AHLT) and JPMorgan Managed Futures Plus ETF (JPFP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AHLT | JPFP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.51 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.93 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AHLT vs. JPFP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AHLT drawdown since its inception was -20.18%, which is greater than JPFP's maximum drawdown of -6.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AHLT and JPFP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AHLT | JPFP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.18% | -6.04% | -14.14% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.26% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.87% | -3.23% | +0.36% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.16% | -3.18% | -5.98% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.24% | — | — |
Volatility
AHLT vs. JPFP - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AHLT | JPFP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.01% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.63% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.61% | 19.92% | -2.31% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.31% | 19.92% | -2.61% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.31% | 19.92% | -2.61% |
AHLT vs. JPFP - Expense Ratio Comparison
AHLT has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than JPFP's 0.59% expense ratio.
Dividends
AHLT vs. JPFP - Dividend Comparison
AHLT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.54%, while JPFP has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
AHLT American Beacon AHL Trend ETF | 1.54% | 1.70% | 0.00% | 3.72% |
JPFP JPMorgan Managed Futures Plus ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AHLT and JPFP have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, JPFP is cheaper at 0.59% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
JPFP is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for AHLT.
AHLT has the higher dividend yield at 1.54%, compared with 0.00% for JPFP.
They also come from different issuers: American Beacon and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for AHLT and 0.59% for JPFP.
Find the right allocation for AHLT and JPFP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer