AGQ vs. GLL
AGQ (ProShares Ultra Silver) and GLL (ProShares UltraShort Gold) are both exchange-traded funds - AGQ is a Silver fund tracking the Bloomberg Silver Subindex (200%), while GLL is a Leveraged Commodities fund tracking the Bloomberg Gold (-200%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, AGQ returned 6.90%/yr vs -21.56%/yr for GLL. At a correlation of -0.79, they often move in opposite directions. AGQ charges 0.93%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for GLL.
Performance
AGQ vs. GLL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AGQ achieves a -46.29% return, which is significantly lower than GLL's -4.93% return. Over the past 10 years, AGQ has outperformed GLL with an annualized return of 6.90%, while GLL has yielded a comparatively lower -21.56% annualized return.
AGQ
- 1D
- -1.92%
- 1M
- -27.43%
- YTD
- -46.29%
- 6M
- -45.77%
- 1Y
- 75.71%
- 3Y*
- 47.17%
- 5Y*
- 13.07%
- 10Y*
- 6.90%
GLL
- 1D
- 1.30%
- 1M
- 14.51%
- YTD
- -4.93%
- 6M
- 0.89%
- 1Y
- -42.21%
- 3Y*
- -40.08%
- 5Y*
- -29.04%
- 10Y*
- -21.56%
AGQ vs. GLL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AGQ ProShares Ultra Silver | -46.29% | 360.71% | 23.92% | -15.09% | -7.89% | -32.25% | 62.02% | 20.02% | -22.10% | 5.49% |
GLL ProShares UltraShort Gold | -4.93% | -62.81% | -33.33% | -14.91% | -2.12% | 1.66% | -41.47% | -26.95% | 5.39% | -23.67% |
Correlation
The correlation between AGQ and GLL is -0.79, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.79 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.76 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.76 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.77 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 4, 2008 | -0.79 |
The correlation between AGQ and GLL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.79 to -0.76 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AGQ vs. GLL — Risk / Return Rank
AGQ
GLL
AGQ vs. GLL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra Silver (AGQ) and ProShares UltraShort Gold (GLL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AGQ | GLL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.40 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.68 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 0.87 | +0.38 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.95 | -0.65 | +1.60 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.75 | -0.98 | +2.74 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AGQ vs. GLL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AGQ drawdown since its inception was -98.16%, roughly equal to the maximum GLL drawdown of -99.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AGQ and GLL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AGQ | GLL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -98.16% | -99.24% | +1.08% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -79.89% | -65.10% | -14.79% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -79.89% | -87.95% | +8.06% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -79.89% | -89.76% | +9.87% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -79.89% | -95.76% | +15.87% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -88.59% | -98.82% | +10.23% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -79.86% | -85.15% | +5.29% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 43.33% | 43.00% | +0.33% |
Volatility
AGQ vs. GLL - Volatility Comparison
ProShares Ultra Silver (AGQ) has a higher volatility of 27.83% compared to ProShares UltraShort Gold (GLL) at 15.88%. This indicates that AGQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GLL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AGQ | GLL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 27.83% | 15.88% | +11.95% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 134.92% | 46.76% | +88.16% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 123.30% | 54.33% | +68.97% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 75.37% | 36.36% | +39.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 66.08% | 32.42% | +33.66% |
AGQ vs. GLL - Expense Ratio Comparison
AGQ has a 0.93% expense ratio, which is lower than GLL's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
AGQ vs. GLL - Dividend Comparison
Neither AGQ nor GLL has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
AGQ and GLL have a correlation of -0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AGQ has higher volatility (27.83%) compared to GLL (15.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AGQ dropped -98.16% vs GLL's -99.24%.
On 10-year performance, AGQ leads with 6.90% vs -21.56% for GLL. On fees, AGQ is cheaper at 0.93% per year. On volatility, GLL has been the lower-risk option at 15.88%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, AGQ has performed better with a 6.90% return vs -21.56%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
AGQ is cheaper with a 0.93% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for GLL.
AGQ and GLL have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
AGQ is categorized as Silver, while GLL is Leveraged Commodities. AGQ tracks Bloomberg Silver Subindex (200%), while GLL tracks Bloomberg Gold (-200%). Their fees differ too: 0.93% for AGQ and 0.95% for GLL.
AGQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.62 vs -0.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AGQ and GLL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer