AGQ vs. SIVR
Compare and contrast key facts about ProShares Ultra Silver (AGQ) and Aberdeen Standard Physical Silver Shares ETF (SIVR).
AGQ and SIVR are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. AGQ is a passively managed fund by ProShares that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg Silver (-200%). It was launched on Dec 1, 2008. SIVR is a passively managed fund by Abrdn Plc that tracks the performance of the LBMA Silver Price ($/ozt). It was launched on Jul 24, 2009. Both AGQ and SIVR are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: AGQ or SIVR.
Correlation
The correlation between AGQ and SIVR is 0.21, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
AGQ vs. SIVR - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
AGQ:
0.37
SIVR:
0.74
AGQ:
0.94
SIVR:
1.19
AGQ:
1.12
SIVR:
1.15
AGQ:
0.25
SIVR:
0.48
AGQ:
1.28
SIVR:
2.62
AGQ:
18.95%
SIVR:
8.75%
AGQ:
65.38%
SIVR:
31.11%
AGQ:
-98.16%
SIVR:
-75.85%
AGQ:
-94.21%
SIVR:
-33.53%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AGQ achieves a 25.60% return, which is significantly higher than SIVR's 16.21% return. Over the past 10 years, AGQ has underperformed SIVR with an annualized return of 0.53%, while SIVR has yielded a comparatively higher 7.15% annualized return.
AGQ
25.60%
-5.26%
-9.25%
24.53%
14.77%
0.53%
SIVR
16.21%
-0.12%
-0.34%
22.95%
16.84%
7.15%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
AGQ vs. SIVR - Expense Ratio Comparison
AGQ has a 0.93% expense ratio, which is higher than SIVR's 0.30% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
AGQ vs. SIVR — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
AGQ
SIVR
AGQ vs. SIVR - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra Silver (AGQ) and Aberdeen Standard Physical Silver Shares ETF (SIVR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
AGQ vs. SIVR - Dividend Comparison
Neither AGQ nor SIVR has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
AGQ vs. SIVR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AGQ drawdown since its inception was -98.16%, which is greater than SIVR's maximum drawdown of -75.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AGQ and SIVR. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
AGQ vs. SIVR - Volatility Comparison
ProShares Ultra Silver (AGQ) has a higher volatility of 27.98% compared to Aberdeen Standard Physical Silver Shares ETF (SIVR) at 11.50%. This indicates that AGQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SIVR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.