AGQ vs. HYMC
AGQ (ProShares Ultra Silver) is Silver fund tracking the Bloomberg Silver Subindex (200%), while HYMC (Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation) is a stock. Over the past 5 years, AGQ returned 8.02%/yr vs -3.22%/yr for HYMC. Their 0.38 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
AGQ vs. HYMC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AGQ achieves a -58.79% return, which is significantly lower than HYMC's -17.84% return.
AGQ
- 1D
- -4.43%
- 1M
- -11.11%
- 6M
- -60.08%
- YTD
- -58.79%
- 1Y
- 29.99%
- 3Y*
- 28.23%
- 5Y*
- 8.02%
- 10Y*
- 1.23%
- ALL TIME*
- 1.91%
HYMC
- 1D
- -2.69%
- 1M
- -17.32%
- 6M
- -47.71%
- YTD
- -17.84%
- 1Y
- 462.82%
- 3Y*
- 63.48%
- 5Y*
- -3.22%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -17.25%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $125.84M | $135.44M | $281.05M | |
| $28.70M | $31.30M | $59.64M |
AGQ vs. HYMC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AGQ ProShares Ultra Silver | -58.79% | 360.71% | 23.92% | -15.09% | -7.89% | -32.25% | 62.02% | 20.02% | -17.93% |
HYMC Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation | -17.84% | 975.57% | -9.80% | -53.96% | -13.30% | -92.18% | -24.03% | 4.59% | 3.35% |
Correlation
The correlation between AGQ and HYMC is 0.62, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.62 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.53 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.46 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 12, 2018 | 0.38 |
Over the past year, AGQ and HYMC have become more correlated (0.62) than their long-term average of 0.38, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AGQ vs. HYMC — Risk / Return Rank
AGQ
HYMC
AGQ vs. HYMC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra Silver (AGQ) and Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation (HYMC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AGQ | HYMC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.96 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.50 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.44 | -0.25 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.38 | 7.52 | -7.15 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.62 | 16.32 | -15.70 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AGQ vs. HYMC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AGQ drawdown since its inception was -98.16%, roughly equal to the maximum HYMC drawdown of -98.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AGQ and HYMC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AGQ | HYMC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -98.16% | -98.89% | +0.73% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -85.13% | -66.93% | -18.20% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -85.13% | -66.93% | -18.20% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -85.13% | -93.21% | +8.08% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -85.13% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -91.25% | -87.65% | -3.60% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -79.93% | -63.72% | -16.21% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 51.43% | 30.78% | +20.65% |
Volatility
AGQ vs. HYMC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ProShares Ultra Silver (AGQ) is 22.86%, while Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation (HYMC) has a volatility of 24.42%. This indicates that AGQ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HYMC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AGQ | HYMC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 22.86% | 24.42% | -1.56% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 127.92% | 77.08% | +50.84% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 125.49% | 119.53% | +5.96% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 76.26% | 152.74% | -76.48% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 66.42% | 122.43% | -56.01% |
Dividends
AGQ vs. HYMC - Dividend Comparison
Neither AGQ nor HYMC has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
AGQ and HYMC have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HYMC has higher volatility (24.42%) compared to AGQ (22.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AGQ dropped -98.16% vs HYMC's -98.89%.
HYMC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.21 vs 0.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AGQ and HYMC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer