AGQ vs. PAAS

In the year-to-date period, AGQ achieves a 25.60% return, which is significantly lower than PAAS's 29.18% return. Over the past 10 years, AGQ has underperformed PAAS with an annualized return of 0.53%, while PAAS has yielded a comparatively higher 12.22% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra Silver (AGQ) and Pan American Silver Corp. (PAAS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current AGQ Sharpe Ratio is 0.37, which is lower than the PAAS Sharpe Ratio of 0.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AGQ and PAAS, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

AGQ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PAAS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.54%.

The maximum AGQ drawdown since its inception was -98.16%, which is greater than PAAS's maximum drawdown of -85.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AGQ and PAAS. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

ProShares Ultra Silver (AGQ) has a higher volatility of 27.98% compared to Pan American Silver Corp. (PAAS) at 21.22%. This indicates that AGQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PAAS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.