AGIQ vs. LRNZ

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

AGIQ (SoFi Agentic AI ETF) and LRNZ (TrueShares Technology, AI & Deep Learning ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - AGIQ is a Technology Equities fund tracking the BITA US Agentic AI Select Index, while LRNZ is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by TrueMark Investments. AGIQ is passively managed, while LRNZ is actively managed. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. AGIQ charges 0.69%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for LRNZ.

Performance

AGIQ vs. LRNZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SoFi Agentic AI ETF (AGIQ) and TrueShares Technology, AI & Deep Learning ETF (LRNZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AGIQ achieves a 10.78% return, which is significantly lower than LRNZ's 29.07% return.

AGIQ

• 1D: -0.24%
• 1M: 11.12%
• YTD: 10.78%
• 6M: 8.45%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

LRNZ

• 1D: -1.41%
• 1M: 29.38%
• YTD: 29.07%
• 6M: 29.15%
• 1Y: 45.73%
• 3Y*: 24.70%
• 5Y*: 8.37%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AGIQ vs. LRNZ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
AGIQ SoFi Agentic AI ETF	10.78%	14.42%
LRNZ TrueShares Technology, AI & Deep Learning ETF	29.07%	9.45%

Correlation

The correlation between AGIQ and LRNZ is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 4, 2025	0.83

AGIQ vs. LRNZ - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	AGIQ	LRNZ
Technology	56.0%	78.4%
Industrials	14.9%	-
Healthcare	13.4%	16.3%
Consumer Cyclical	9.5%	-
Communication Services	6.0%	5.3%
Basic Materials	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Financial Services	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

AGIQ vs. LRNZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LRNZ

LRNZ Risk / Return Rank: 40
LRNZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 47
LRNZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 45
LRNZ Omega Ratio Rank: 42
LRNZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 35
LRNZ Martin Ratio Rank: 29

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AGIQ vs. LRNZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SoFi Agentic AI ETF (AGIQ) and TrueShares Technology, AI & Deep Learning ETF (LRNZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	AGIQ	LRNZ	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	1.59	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.23	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.61	0.41	+1.20

Drawdowns

AGIQ vs. LRNZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AGIQ drawdown since its inception was -19.72%, smaller than the maximum LRNZ drawdown of -61.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AGIQ and LRNZ.

Drawdown Indicators

	AGIQ	LRNZ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-19.72%	-61.33%	+41.61%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-26.89%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-33.10%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-61.33%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.88%	-3.94%	+2.06%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.15%	-26.65%	+20.50%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	10.94%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	AGIQ	LRNZ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	10.68%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	23.24%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	23.17%	28.90%	-5.73%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	23.17%	37.26%	-14.09%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.17%	37.63%	-14.46%

AGIQ vs. LRNZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

AGIQ has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is higher than LRNZ's 0.68% expense ratio.

Dividends

AGIQ vs. LRNZ - Dividend Comparison

AGIQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.34%, while LRNZ has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
AGIQ SoFi Agentic AI ETF	0.34%	0.38%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
LRNZ TrueShares Technology, AI & Deep Learning ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.13%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AGIQ and LRNZ in my portfolio?

AGIQ and LRNZ have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, AGIQ or LRNZ?

On fees, LRNZ is cheaper at 0.68% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, AGIQ or LRNZ?

LRNZ is cheaper with a 0.68% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for AGIQ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, AGIQ or LRNZ?

AGIQ has the higher dividend yield at 0.34%, compared with 0.00% for LRNZ.

What is the main difference between AGIQ and LRNZ?

AGIQ is categorized as Technology Equities, while LRNZ is Large Cap Growth Equities. They also come from different issuers: SoFi and TrueMark Investments. Their fees differ too: 0.69% for AGIQ and 0.68% for LRNZ.