PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AFTY vs. KBA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AFTY vs. KBA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacer CSOP FTSE China A50 ETF (AFTY) and KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A Share ETF (KBA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


AFTY

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

KBA

1D
0.14%
1M
4.32%
YTD
12.62%
6M
16.80%
1Y
49.12%
3Y*
16.22%
5Y*
6.46%
10Y*
10.15%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AFTY vs. KBA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AFTY
Pacer CSOP FTSE China A50 ETF
0.00%0.00%20.48%-12.80%-22.47%-7.37%33.77%44.23%-24.26%45.15%
KBA
KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A Share ETF
12.62%33.88%15.73%-16.77%-3.49%3.17%41.62%35.44%-26.28%30.69%

Correlation

The correlation between AFTY and KBA is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.57

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.75

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.82

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 13, 2015

0.82

The correlation between AFTY and KBA shifts across timeframes, from 0.57 (3 years) to 0.82 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

AFTY vs. KBA - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
AFTY
KBA

Financial Services

50.4%
18.5%

Basic Materials

15.5%
10.9%

Energy

11.5%
3.2%

Technology

7.4%
29.8%

Consumer Defensive

6.1%
6.8%

Industrials

4.7%
15.8%

Utilities

4.4%
3.2%

Communication Services

-

1.6%

Consumer Cyclical

-

5.7%

Healthcare

-

4.1%

Real Estate

-

0.6%

Financial Services

AFTY
50.4%
KBA
18.5%

Basic Materials

AFTY
15.5%
KBA
10.9%

Energy

AFTY
11.5%
KBA
3.2%

Technology

AFTY
7.4%
KBA
29.8%

Consumer Defensive

AFTY
6.1%
KBA
6.8%

Industrials

AFTY
4.7%
KBA
15.8%

Utilities

AFTY
4.4%
KBA
3.2%

Communication Services

AFTY

-

KBA
1.6%

Consumer Cyclical

AFTY

-

KBA
5.7%

Healthcare

AFTY

-

KBA
4.1%

Real Estate

AFTY

-

KBA
0.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AFTY vs. KBA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AFTY

KBA
KBA Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
KBA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KBA Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
KBA Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
KBA Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
KBA Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AFTY vs. KBA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer CSOP FTSE China A50 ETF (AFTY) and KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A Share ETF (KBA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

AFTY vs. KBA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AFTYKBADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.80

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.24

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.40

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.35

Drawdowns

AFTY vs. KBA - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AFTYKBADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-53.24%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.65%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-31.23%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-39.95%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-25.81%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.85%

Volatility

AFTY vs. KBA - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AFTYKBADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.29%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.44%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.65%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

27.20%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.32%

AFTY vs. KBA - Expense Ratio Comparison

AFTY has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than KBA's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

AFTY vs. KBA - Dividend Comparison

AFTY has not paid dividends to shareholders, while KBA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.39%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AFTY
Pacer CSOP FTSE China A50 ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%2.23%2.08%1.84%1.48%7.96%1.85%6.62%1.19%16.76%
KBA
KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A Share ETF
1.39%1.56%2.18%2.34%49.05%9.07%0.65%1.53%3.77%1.46%6.62%29.08%

Frequently Asked Questions


AFTY and KBA have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, KBA is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

KBA is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for AFTY.

KBA has the higher dividend yield at 1.39%, compared with 0.00% for AFTY.

AFTY tracks FTSE China A 50, while KBA tracks MSCI China A Index. They also come from different issuers: Pacer and CICC. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for AFTY and 0.60% for KBA.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AFTY and KBA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer