AFTY vs. ICOW
AFTY (Pacer CSOP FTSE China A50 ETF) and ICOW (Pacer Developed Markets International Cash Cows 100 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - AFTY is a China Equities fund tracking the FTSE China A 50, while ICOW is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the Pacer Developed Markets International Cash Cows 100 Index. Both are passively managed. At a 0.44 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. AFTY charges 0.70%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for ICOW.
Performance
AFTY vs. ICOW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
AFTY
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ICOW
- 1D
- -0.64%
- 1M
- 3.47%
- YTD
- 17.35%
- 6M
- 18.06%
- 1Y
- 39.15%
- 3Y*
- 20.17%
- 5Y*
- 10.06%
- 10Y*
- —
AFTY vs. ICOW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AFTY Pacer CSOP FTSE China A50 ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 20.48% | -12.80% | -22.47% | -7.37% | 33.77% | 44.23% | -24.26% | 26.41% |
ICOW Pacer Developed Markets International Cash Cows 100 ETF | 17.35% | 36.95% | -2.59% | 18.94% | -7.98% | 11.52% | 7.20% | 17.91% | -16.09% | 16.98% |
Correlation
The correlation between AFTY and ICOW is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 20, 2017 | 0.44 |
The correlation between AFTY and ICOW shifts across timeframes, from 0.26 (3 years) to 0.44 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
AFTY vs. ICOW - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
AFTY
ICOW
Financial Services
-
Basic Materials
Energy
Technology
Consumer Defensive
Industrials
Utilities
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
-
Financial Services
AFTY
ICOW
-
Basic Materials
AFTY
ICOW
Energy
AFTY
ICOW
Technology
AFTY
ICOW
Consumer Defensive
AFTY
ICOW
Industrials
AFTY
ICOW
Utilities
AFTY
ICOW
-
Communication Services
AFTY
-
ICOW
Consumer Cyclical
AFTY
-
ICOW
Healthcare
AFTY
-
ICOW
Real Estate
AFTY
-
ICOW
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AFTY vs. ICOW — Risk / Return Rank
AFTY
ICOW
AFTY vs. ICOW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer CSOP FTSE China A50 ETF (AFTY) and Pacer Developed Markets International Cash Cows 100 ETF (ICOW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AFTY | ICOW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.87 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.61 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | — | 0.55 | — |
Drawdowns
AFTY vs. ICOW - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AFTY | ICOW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | — | -43.49% | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -8.02% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -14.81% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -28.48% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | — | -0.64% | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | — | -7.59% | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.24% | — |
Volatility
AFTY vs. ICOW - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AFTY | ICOW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 4.41% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 10.59% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 13.73% | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | — | 16.64% | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | — | 18.47% | — |
AFTY vs. ICOW - Expense Ratio Comparison
AFTY has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than ICOW's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
AFTY vs. ICOW - Dividend Comparison
AFTY has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ICOW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.12%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AFTY Pacer CSOP FTSE China A50 ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 2.23% | 2.08% | 1.84% | 1.48% | 7.96% | 1.85% | 6.62% | 1.19% | 16.76% |
ICOW Pacer Developed Markets International Cash Cows 100 ETF | 2.12% | 3.03% | 4.39% | 3.61% | 5.26% | 2.11% | 2.46% | 3.10% | 2.61% | 0.80% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AFTY and ICOW have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ICOW is cheaper at 0.65% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ICOW is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for AFTY.
ICOW has the higher dividend yield at 2.12%, compared with 0.00% for AFTY.
AFTY is categorized as China Equities, while ICOW is Foreign Large Cap Equities. AFTY tracks FTSE China A 50, while ICOW tracks Pacer Developed Markets International Cash Cows 100 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for AFTY and 0.65% for ICOW.
Find the right allocation for AFTY and ICOW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer