PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AFTY vs. ASHS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AFTY vs. ASHS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacer CSOP FTSE China A50 ETF (AFTY) and Xtrackers Harvest CSI 500 China A-Shares Small Cap ETF (ASHS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


AFTY

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

ASHS

1D
-0.17%
1M
-0.19%
YTD
15.10%
6M
23.90%
1Y
57.65%
3Y*
13.41%
5Y*
3.97%
10Y*
3.27%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AFTY vs. ASHS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AFTY
Pacer CSOP FTSE China A50 ETF
0.00%0.00%20.48%-12.80%-22.47%-7.37%33.77%44.23%-24.26%45.15%
ASHS
Xtrackers Harvest CSI 500 China A-Shares Small Cap ETF
15.10%39.48%2.68%-10.03%-24.78%17.66%28.22%24.53%-35.91%7.90%

Correlation

The correlation between AFTY and ASHS is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.39

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.52

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.60

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 13, 2015

0.61

The correlation between AFTY and ASHS shifts across timeframes, from 0.39 (3 years) to 0.61 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

AFTY vs. ASHS - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
AFTY
ASHS

Financial Services

50.4%
6.3%

Basic Materials

15.5%
19.4%

Energy

11.5%
3.2%

Technology

7.4%
29.8%

Consumer Defensive

6.1%
2.6%

Industrials

4.7%
19.7%

Utilities

4.4%
2.2%

Communication Services

-

3.2%

Consumer Cyclical

-

5.8%

Healthcare

-

7.2%

Real Estate

-

0.7%

Financial Services

AFTY
50.4%
ASHS
6.3%

Basic Materials

AFTY
15.5%
ASHS
19.4%

Energy

AFTY
11.5%
ASHS
3.2%

Technology

AFTY
7.4%
ASHS
29.8%

Consumer Defensive

AFTY
6.1%
ASHS
2.6%

Industrials

AFTY
4.7%
ASHS
19.7%

Utilities

AFTY
4.4%
ASHS
2.2%

Communication Services

AFTY

-

ASHS
3.2%

Consumer Cyclical

AFTY

-

ASHS
5.8%

Healthcare

AFTY

-

ASHS
7.2%

Real Estate

AFTY

-

ASHS
0.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AFTY vs. ASHS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AFTY

ASHS
ASHS Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
ASHS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ASHS Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
ASHS Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
ASHS Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
ASHS Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AFTY vs. ASHS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer CSOP FTSE China A50 ETF (AFTY) and Xtrackers Harvest CSI 500 China A-Shares Small Cap ETF (ASHS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

AFTY vs. ASHS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AFTYASHSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.57

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.15

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.13

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.19

Drawdowns

AFTY vs. ASHS - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AFTYASHSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-69.90%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.03%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-34.13%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-47.81%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-47.81%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-33.57%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-48.57%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.21%

Volatility

AFTY vs. ASHS - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AFTYASHSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.33%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.00%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.59%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.46%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.57%

AFTY vs. ASHS - Expense Ratio Comparison

AFTY has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than ASHS's 0.65% expense ratio.


Dividends

AFTY vs. ASHS - Dividend Comparison

Neither AFTY nor ASHS has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AFTY
Pacer CSOP FTSE China A50 ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%2.23%2.08%1.84%1.48%7.96%1.85%6.62%1.19%16.76%
ASHS
Xtrackers Harvest CSI 500 China A-Shares Small Cap ETF
0.00%0.00%0.69%0.65%1.90%0.76%0.43%0.57%0.00%0.00%0.00%8.34%

Frequently Asked Questions


AFTY and ASHS have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ASHS is cheaper at 0.65% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ASHS is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for AFTY.

AFTY and ASHS have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

AFTY tracks FTSE China A 50, while ASHS tracks CSI 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: Pacer and Deutsche Bank. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for AFTY and 0.65% for ASHS.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AFTY and ASHS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer