AFTY vs. ASHS
AFTY (Pacer CSOP FTSE China A50 ETF) and ASHS (Xtrackers Harvest CSI 500 China A-Shares Small Cap ETF) are both China Equities funds - AFTY tracks the FTSE China A 50 while ASHS tracks the CSI 500 Index. Both are passively managed. A 0.61 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. AFTY charges 0.70%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for ASHS.
Performance
AFTY vs. ASHS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
AFTY
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ASHS
- 1D
- -0.17%
- 1M
- -0.19%
- YTD
- 15.10%
- 6M
- 23.90%
- 1Y
- 57.65%
- 3Y*
- 13.41%
- 5Y*
- 3.97%
- 10Y*
- 3.27%
AFTY vs. ASHS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AFTY Pacer CSOP FTSE China A50 ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 20.48% | -12.80% | -22.47% | -7.37% | 33.77% | 44.23% | -24.26% | 45.15% |
ASHS Xtrackers Harvest CSI 500 China A-Shares Small Cap ETF | 15.10% | 39.48% | 2.68% | -10.03% | -24.78% | 17.66% | 28.22% | 24.53% | -35.91% | 7.90% |
Correlation
The correlation between AFTY and ASHS is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 13, 2015 | 0.61 |
The correlation between AFTY and ASHS shifts across timeframes, from 0.39 (3 years) to 0.61 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
AFTY vs. ASHS - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
AFTY
ASHS
Financial Services
Basic Materials
Energy
Technology
Consumer Defensive
Industrials
Utilities
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
Financial Services
AFTY
ASHS
Basic Materials
AFTY
ASHS
Energy
AFTY
ASHS
Technology
AFTY
ASHS
Consumer Defensive
AFTY
ASHS
Industrials
AFTY
ASHS
Utilities
AFTY
ASHS
Communication Services
AFTY
-
ASHS
Consumer Cyclical
AFTY
-
ASHS
Healthcare
AFTY
-
ASHS
Real Estate
AFTY
-
ASHS
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AFTY vs. ASHS — Risk / Return Rank
AFTY
ASHS
AFTY vs. ASHS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer CSOP FTSE China A50 ETF (AFTY) and Xtrackers Harvest CSI 500 China A-Shares Small Cap ETF (ASHS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AFTY | ASHS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.57 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.15 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.13 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | — | 0.19 | — |
Drawdowns
AFTY vs. ASHS - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AFTY | ASHS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | — | -69.90% | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -14.03% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -34.13% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -47.81% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -47.81% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | — | -33.57% | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | — | -48.57% | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 4.21% | — |
Volatility
AFTY vs. ASHS - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AFTY | ASHS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 7.33% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 17.00% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 22.59% | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | — | 26.46% | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | — | 25.57% | — |
AFTY vs. ASHS - Expense Ratio Comparison
AFTY has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than ASHS's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
AFTY vs. ASHS - Dividend Comparison
Neither AFTY nor ASHS has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AFTY Pacer CSOP FTSE China A50 ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 2.23% | 2.08% | 1.84% | 1.48% | 7.96% | 1.85% | 6.62% | 1.19% | 16.76% |
ASHS Xtrackers Harvest CSI 500 China A-Shares Small Cap ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.69% | 0.65% | 1.90% | 0.76% | 0.43% | 0.57% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 8.34% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AFTY and ASHS have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ASHS is cheaper at 0.65% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ASHS is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for AFTY.
AFTY and ASHS have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
AFTY tracks FTSE China A 50, while ASHS tracks CSI 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: Pacer and Deutsche Bank. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for AFTY and 0.65% for ASHS.
Find the right allocation for AFTY and ASHS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer