PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AFRU vs. MSFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AFRU vs. MSFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T-REX 2X Long AFRM Daily Target ETF (AFRU) and T-Rex 2X Long Microsoft Daily Target ETF (MSFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AFRU achieves a -38.11% return, which is significantly lower than MSFX's -28.34% return.


AFRU

1D
-13.32%
1M
-6.56%
YTD
-38.11%
6M
-32.41%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

MSFX

1D
-6.67%
1M
5.21%
YTD
-28.34%
6M
-29.12%
1Y
-29.20%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AFRU vs. MSFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
AFRU
T-REX 2X Long AFRM Daily Target ETF
-38.11%-42.30%
MSFX
T-Rex 2X Long Microsoft Daily Target ETF
-28.34%-15.22%

Correlation

The correlation between AFRU and MSFX is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 17, 2025

0.40

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AFRU vs. MSFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AFRU

MSFX
MSFX Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
MSFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MSFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
MSFX Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
MSFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
MSFX Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AFRU vs. MSFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-REX 2X Long AFRM Daily Target ETF (AFRU) and T-Rex 2X Long Microsoft Daily Target ETF (MSFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

AFRU vs. MSFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AFRUMSFXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.58

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.63

-0.17

-0.47

Drawdowns

AFRU vs. MSFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AFRU drawdown since its inception was -84.44%, which is greater than MSFX's maximum drawdown of -60.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AFRU and MSFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AFRUMSFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-84.44%

-60.86%

-23.58%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-60.86%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-65.60%

-45.75%

-19.85%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-56.01%

-21.24%

-34.77%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

31.80%

Volatility

AFRU vs. MSFX - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AFRUMSFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

19.56%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

45.26%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

121.30%

50.40%

+70.90%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

121.30%

49.33%

+71.97%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

121.30%

49.33%

+71.97%

AFRU vs. MSFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

AFRU has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than MSFX's 1.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

AFRU vs. MSFX - Dividend Comparison

AFRU has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MSFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.45%.


Frequently Asked Questions


AFRU and MSFX have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, MSFX is cheaper at 1.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

MSFX is cheaper with a 1.05% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for AFRU.

MSFX has the higher dividend yield at 7.45%, compared with 0.00% for AFRU.

Their fees differ too: 1.50% for AFRU and 1.05% for MSFX.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AFRU and MSFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer