AFRU vs. MSFX
AFRU (T-REX 2X Long AFRM Daily Target ETF) and MSFX (T-Rex 2X Long Microsoft Daily Target ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds from T-Rex. Both are actively managed. At a 0.40 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. AFRU charges 1.50%/yr vs 1.05%/yr for MSFX.
Performance
AFRU vs. MSFX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AFRU achieves a -38.11% return, which is significantly lower than MSFX's -28.34% return.
AFRU
- 1D
- -13.32%
- 1M
- -6.56%
- YTD
- -38.11%
- 6M
- -32.41%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MSFX
- 1D
- -6.67%
- 1M
- 5.21%
- YTD
- -28.34%
- 6M
- -29.12%
- 1Y
- -29.20%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AFRU vs. MSFX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
AFRU T-REX 2X Long AFRM Daily Target ETF | -38.11% | -42.30% |
MSFX T-Rex 2X Long Microsoft Daily Target ETF | -28.34% | -15.22% |
Correlation
The correlation between AFRU and MSFX is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 17, 2025 | 0.40 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AFRU vs. MSFX — Risk / Return Rank
AFRU
MSFX
AFRU vs. MSFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-REX 2X Long AFRM Daily Target ETF (AFRU) and T-Rex 2X Long Microsoft Daily Target ETF (MSFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AFRU | MSFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | -0.58 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.63 | -0.17 | -0.47 |
Drawdowns
AFRU vs. MSFX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AFRU drawdown since its inception was -84.44%, which is greater than MSFX's maximum drawdown of -60.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AFRU and MSFX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AFRU | MSFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -84.44% | -60.86% | -23.58% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -60.86% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -65.60% | -45.75% | -19.85% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -56.01% | -21.24% | -34.77% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 31.80% | — |
Volatility
AFRU vs. MSFX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AFRU | MSFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 19.56% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 45.26% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 121.30% | 50.40% | +70.90% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 121.30% | 49.33% | +71.97% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 121.30% | 49.33% | +71.97% |
AFRU vs. MSFX - Expense Ratio Comparison
AFRU has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than MSFX's 1.05% expense ratio.
Dividends
AFRU vs. MSFX - Dividend Comparison
AFRU has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MSFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.45%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
AFRU T-REX 2X Long AFRM Daily Target ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MSFX T-Rex 2X Long Microsoft Daily Target ETF | 7.45% | 5.34% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AFRU and MSFX have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, MSFX is cheaper at 1.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
MSFX is cheaper with a 1.05% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for AFRU.
MSFX has the higher dividend yield at 7.45%, compared with 0.00% for AFRU.
Their fees differ too: 1.50% for AFRU and 1.05% for MSFX.
Find the right allocation for AFRU and MSFX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer