AFLG vs. SPYG
AFLG (First Trust Active Factor Large Cap ETF) and SPYG (State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - AFLG is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Large Cap Equity Index, while SPYG is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Growth Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, AFLG returned 12.26%/yr vs 14.08%/yr for SPYG. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. AFLG charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for SPYG.
Performance
AFLG vs. SPYG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AFLG achieves a 9.65% return, which is significantly higher than SPYG's 8.55% return.
AFLG
- 1D
- 0.03%
- 1M
- -2.29%
- YTD
- 9.65%
- 6M
- 7.95%
- 1Y
- 20.76%
- 3Y*
- 21.12%
- 5Y*
- 12.26%
- 10Y*
- —
SPYG
- 1D
- 0.06%
- 1M
- -3.41%
- YTD
- 8.55%
- 6M
- 7.04%
- 1Y
- 24.40%
- 3Y*
- 25.78%
- 5Y*
- 14.08%
- 10Y*
- 18.23%
AFLG vs. SPYG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AFLG First Trust Active Factor Large Cap ETF | 9.65% | 14.23% | 27.02% | 20.10% | -16.41% | 27.29% | 10.31% | 2.58% |
SPYG State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF | 8.55% | 22.09% | 35.99% | 30.02% | -29.41% | 32.01% | 33.46% | 4.32% |
Correlation
The correlation between AFLG and SPYG is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 4, 2019 | 0.87 |
The correlation between AFLG and SPYG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.
AFLG vs. SPYG - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
AFLG
SPYG
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Financial Services
Industrials
Healthcare
Energy
Utilities
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
Technology
AFLG
SPYG
Consumer Cyclical
AFLG
SPYG
Communication Services
AFLG
SPYG
Financial Services
AFLG
SPYG
Industrials
AFLG
SPYG
Healthcare
AFLG
SPYG
Energy
AFLG
SPYG
Utilities
AFLG
SPYG
Basic Materials
AFLG
SPYG
Consumer Defensive
AFLG
SPYG
Real Estate
AFLG
SPYG
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AFLG vs. SPYG — Risk / Return Rank
AFLG
SPYG
AFLG vs. SPYG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Active Factor Large Cap ETF (AFLG) and State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF (SPYG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AFLG | SPYG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.33 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.45 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.25 | +0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.55 | 1.78 | +0.76 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.18 | 7.00 | +4.18 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AFLG vs. SPYG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AFLG drawdown since its inception was -35.84%, smaller than the maximum SPYG drawdown of -67.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AFLG and SPYG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AFLG | SPYG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.84% | -67.63% | +31.79% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.19% | -13.76% | +5.57% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.49% | -22.14% | +4.65% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.48% | -32.67% | +9.19% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -32.67% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.94% | -5.65% | +2.71% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.68% | -24.28% | +18.60% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.86% | 3.49% | -1.63% |
Volatility
AFLG vs. SPYG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for First Trust Active Factor Large Cap ETF (AFLG) is 4.12%, while State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF (SPYG) has a volatility of 7.12%. This indicates that AFLG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPYG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AFLG | SPYG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.12% | 7.12% | -3.00% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.43% | 13.84% | -4.41% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.89% | 17.17% | -5.28% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.89% | 21.36% | -5.47% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.17% | 20.72% | -1.55% |
AFLG vs. SPYG - Expense Ratio Comparison
AFLG has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than SPYG's 0.04% expense ratio.
Dividends
AFLG vs. SPYG - Dividend Comparison
AFLG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.88%, more than SPYG's 0.50% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AFLG First Trust Active Factor Large Cap ETF | 0.88% | 0.84% | 0.53% | 1.53% | 1.52% | 0.93% | 1.28% | 0.20% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPYG State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF | 0.50% | 0.52% | 0.60% | 1.15% | 1.03% | 0.62% | 0.90% | 1.37% | 1.51% | 1.41% | 1.55% | 1.57% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AFLG and SPYG have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SPYG has higher volatility (7.12%) compared to AFLG (4.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AFLG dropped -35.84% vs SPYG's -67.63%.
On 5-year performance, SPYG leads with 14.08% vs 12.26% for AFLG. On fees, SPYG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, AFLG has been the lower-risk option at 4.12%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, SPYG has performed better with a 14.08% return vs 12.26%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPYG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for AFLG.
AFLG has the higher dividend yield at 0.88%, compared with 0.50% for SPYG.
AFLG is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while SPYG is S&P 500. AFLG tracks Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Large Cap Equity Index, while SPYG tracks S&P 500 Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for AFLG and 0.04% for SPYG.
AFLG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.75 vs 1.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AFLG and SPYG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer