PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AFL vs. TRV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

AFL vs. TRV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Aflac Incorporated (AFL) and The Travelers Companies, Inc. (TRV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AFL achieves a 7.95% return, which is significantly higher than TRV's 5.79% return. Over the past 10 years, AFL has outperformed TRV with an annualized return of 15.84%, while TRV has yielded a comparatively lower 12.87% annualized return.


AFL

1D
1.16%
1M
2.54%
YTD
7.95%
6M
8.17%
1Y
17.23%
3Y*
21.87%
5Y*
18.60%
10Y*
15.84%

TRV

1D
0.18%
1M
3.63%
YTD
5.79%
6M
7.55%
1Y
16.30%
3Y*
22.19%
5Y*
16.78%
10Y*
12.87%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AFL vs. TRV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AFL
Aflac Incorporated
7.95%8.94%28.08%17.36%26.41%34.55%-13.60%18.55%6.20%29.02%
TRV
The Travelers Companies, Inc.
5.79%22.38%28.76%3.93%22.42%13.96%5.31%17.00%-9.64%13.36%

Correlation

The correlation between AFL and TRV is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.63

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.61

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.64

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 22, 1996

0.51

The correlation between AFL and TRV shifts across timeframes, from 0.51 (all time) to 0.65 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

AFL:

$60.64B

TRV:

$66.49B

EPS

AFL:

$8.76

TRV:

$33.83

PE Ratio

AFL:

13.45

TRV:

9.00

PEG Ratio

AFL:

3.49

TRV:

0.42

PS Ratio

AFL:

3.42

TRV:

1.40

PB Ratio

AFL:

2.70

TRV:

2.08

Total Revenue (TTM)

AFL:

$18.22B

TRV:

$48.94B

Gross Profit (TTM)

AFL:

$8.70B

TRV:

$16.00B

EBITDA (TTM)

AFL:

$6.67B

TRV:

$8.15B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AFL vs. TRV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AFL
AFL Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
AFL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AFL Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
AFL Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
AFL Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
AFL Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

TRV
TRV Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
TRV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TRV Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
TRV Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
TRV Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
TRV Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AFL vs. TRV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Aflac Incorporated (AFL) and The Travelers Companies, Inc. (TRV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AFLTRVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.13

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.17

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.16

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.90

1.97

-0.07

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.72

4.83

-0.11

AFL vs. TRV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AFL Sharpe Ratio is 1.02, which is comparable to the TRV Sharpe Ratio of 0.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AFL and TRV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AFL vs. TRV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AFL drawdown since its inception was -82.71%, which is greater than TRV's maximum drawdown of -55.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AFL and TRV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AFLTRVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-82.71%

-55.11%

-27.60%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.11%

-8.31%

-0.80%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.56%

-12.47%

-1.09%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.86%

-18.90%

-0.96%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-54.89%

-46.28%

-8.61%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.37%

-1.66%

+1.29%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.65%

-11.11%

-0.54%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.66%

3.39%

+0.27%

Volatility

AFL vs. TRV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Aflac Incorporated (AFL) is 5.65%, while The Travelers Companies, Inc. (TRV) has a volatility of 6.11%. This indicates that AFL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TRV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AFLTRVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.65%

6.11%

-0.46%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.28%

12.74%

-0.46%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.07%

18.63%

-1.56%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.93%

21.87%

-0.94%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.76%

24.40%

+1.36%

Dividends

AFL vs. TRV - Dividend Comparison

AFL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.02%, more than TRV's 1.49% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AFL
Aflac Incorporated
2.02%2.10%1.93%2.04%2.22%2.26%2.52%2.04%2.28%1.98%2.39%2.64%
TRV
The Travelers Companies, Inc.
1.49%1.50%1.72%2.06%1.96%2.23%2.40%2.36%2.53%2.09%2.14%2.11%

Financials

AFL vs. TRV - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Aflac Incorporated and The Travelers Companies, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


4.00B6.00B8.00B10.00B12.00B20222023202420252026
4.32B
11.92B
(AFL) Total Revenue
(TRV) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

AFL vs. TRV - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Aflac Incorporated and The Travelers Companies, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%20222023202420252026
57.5%
0
Portfolio components
AFL - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Aflac Incorporated reported a gross profit of 2.48B and revenue of 4.32B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 57.5%.

TRV - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Travelers Companies, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 11.92B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

AFL - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Aflac Incorporated reported an operating income of 1.23B and revenue of 4.32B, resulting in an operating margin of 28.4%.

TRV - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Travelers Companies, Inc. reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 11.92B, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.

AFL - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Aflac Incorporated reported a net income of 1.02B and revenue of 4.32B, resulting in a net margin of 23.6%.

TRV - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Travelers Companies, Inc. reported a net income of 1.71B and revenue of 11.92B, resulting in a net margin of 14.4%.


Frequently Asked Questions


AFL and TRV have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TRV has higher volatility (6.11%) compared to AFL (5.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AFL dropped -82.71% vs TRV's -55.11%.

AFL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.02 vs 0.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AFL and TRV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer