PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TRV vs. CB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

TRV vs. CB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in The Travelers Companies, Inc. (TRV) and Chubb Limited (CB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TRV achieves a 7.92% return, which is significantly higher than CB's 4.82% return. Over the past 10 years, TRV has outperformed CB with an annualized return of 13.25%, while CB has yielded a comparatively lower 12.20% annualized return.


TRV

1D
0.91%
1M
1.78%
YTD
7.92%
6M
7.34%
1Y
19.09%
3Y*
23.57%
5Y*
18.27%
10Y*
13.25%

CB

1D
0.56%
1M
-0.51%
YTD
4.82%
6M
5.22%
1Y
16.04%
3Y*
20.56%
5Y*
17.03%
10Y*
12.20%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TRV vs. CB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TRV
The Travelers Companies, Inc.
7.92%22.38%28.76%3.93%22.42%13.96%5.31%17.00%-9.64%13.36%
CB
Chubb Limited
4.82%14.46%23.89%4.20%15.97%27.85%1.41%22.94%-9.63%12.82%

Correlation

The correlation between TRV and CB is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.69

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.74

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.78

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.80

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 22, 1996

0.68

The correlation between TRV and CB shifts across timeframes, from 0.68 (all time) to 0.80 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

TRV:

$67.84B

CB:

$128.32B

EPS

TRV:

$33.83

CB:

$28.35

PE Ratio

TRV:

9.18

CB:

11.47

PEG Ratio

TRV:

0.43

CB:

0.80

PS Ratio

TRV:

1.43

CB:

2.70

PB Ratio

TRV:

2.12

CB:

1.61

Total Revenue (TTM)

TRV:

$48.94B

CB:

$48.15B

Gross Profit (TTM)

TRV:

$16.00B

CB:

$17.01B

EBITDA (TTM)

TRV:

$8.15B

CB:

$12.22B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TRV vs. CB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TRV
TRV Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
TRV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TRV Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
TRV Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
TRV Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
TRV Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank

CB
CB Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
CB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CB Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
CB Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
CB Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
CB Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TRV vs. CB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The Travelers Companies, Inc. (TRV) and Chubb Limited (CB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TRVCBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.12

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.12

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.17

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.31

1.72

+0.58

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.65

3.88

+1.77

TRV vs. CB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TRV Sharpe Ratio is 1.03, which is comparable to the CB Sharpe Ratio of 0.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TRV and CB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TRV vs. CB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TRV drawdown since its inception was -55.11%, which is greater than CB's maximum drawdown of -50.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TRV and CB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TRVCBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.11%

-50.99%

-4.12%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.31%

-9.36%

+1.05%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.47%

-14.35%

+1.88%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.90%

-19.26%

+0.36%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.28%

-42.59%

-3.69%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-4.55%

+4.55%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.10%

-10.67%

-0.43%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.39%

4.15%

-0.76%

Volatility

TRV vs. CB - Volatility Comparison

The Travelers Companies, Inc. (TRV) and Chubb Limited (CB) have volatilities of 5.80% and 5.77%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TRVCBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.80%

5.77%

+0.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.54%

12.73%

-0.19%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.59%

17.69%

+0.90%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.78%

20.22%

+1.56%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.41%

23.69%

+0.72%

Dividends

TRV vs. CB - Dividend Comparison

TRV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.46%, more than CB's 1.21% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CB
Chubb Limited
1.21%1.22%1.30%1.51%1.49%1.65%2.01%1.91%2.24%1.93%2.07%4.23%
TRV
The Travelers Companies, Inc.
1.46%1.50%1.72%2.06%1.96%2.23%2.40%2.36%2.53%2.09%2.14%2.11%

Financials

TRV vs. CB - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between The Travelers Companies, Inc. and Chubb Limited. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.005.00B10.00B15.00B20222023202420252026
11.92B
1.88B
(TRV) Total Revenue
(CB) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


TRV and CB have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TRV has higher volatility (5.80%) compared to CB (5.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TRV dropped -55.11% vs CB's -50.99%.

TRV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.03 vs 0.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TRV and CB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer