AFGR vs. CIBR
AFGR (First Trust Active Factor Large Cap Growth ETF) and CIBR (First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - AFGR is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by First Trust, while CIBR is a Cybersecurity fund tracking the Nasdaq CTA Cybersecurity Index. AFGR is actively managed, while CIBR is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, AFGR returned 7.22%/yr vs 13.58%/yr for CIBR. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. AFGR charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for CIBR.
Performance
AFGR vs. CIBR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AFGR achieves a 1.90% return, which is significantly lower than CIBR's 19.63% return.
AFGR
- 1D
- 0.27%
- 1M
- 0.10%
- YTD
- 1.90%
- 6M
- 1.80%
- 1Y
- 12.07%
- 3Y*
- 19.38%
- 5Y*
- 7.22%
- 10Y*
- —
CIBR
- 1D
- -0.16%
- 1M
- 12.50%
- YTD
- 19.63%
- 6M
- 15.68%
- 1Y
- 17.38%
- 3Y*
- 24.30%
- 5Y*
- 13.58%
- 10Y*
- 17.88%
AFGR vs. CIBR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AFGR First Trust Active Factor Large Cap Growth ETF | 1.90% | 17.28% | 25.96% | 45.21% | -39.18% | 13.23% | 21.39% |
CIBR First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF | 19.63% | 13.06% | 18.21% | 39.71% | -26.46% | 19.67% | 27.76% |
Correlation
The correlation between AFGR and CIBR is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 22, 2020 | 0.82 |
The correlation between AFGR and CIBR shifts across timeframes, from 0.64 (1 year) to 0.82 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AFGR vs. CIBR — Risk / Return Rank
AFGR
CIBR
AFGR vs. CIBR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Active Factor Large Cap Growth ETF (AFGR) and First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AFGR | CIBR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.04 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.12 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.12 | 1.14 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.61 | 0.79 | -0.18 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.74 | 1.86 | -0.12 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AFGR vs. CIBR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AFGR drawdown since its inception was -45.97%, which is greater than CIBR's maximum drawdown of -33.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AFGR and CIBR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AFGR | CIBR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -45.97% | -33.89% | -12.08% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.89% | -21.99% | +2.10% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.57% | -21.99% | -4.58% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -45.97% | -33.89% | -12.08% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.89% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.84% | -9.53% | +4.69% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.30% | -8.66% | -5.64% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.94% | 9.38% | -2.44% |
Volatility
AFGR vs. CIBR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for First Trust Active Factor Large Cap Growth ETF (AFGR) is 5.45%, while First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR) has a volatility of 12.35%. This indicates that AFGR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CIBR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AFGR | CIBR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.45% | 12.35% | -6.90% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.45% | 21.72% | -7.27% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.53% | 25.16% | -6.63% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.97% | 25.04% | -0.07% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.52% | 23.65% | +0.87% |
AFGR vs. CIBR - Expense Ratio Comparison
AFGR has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than CIBR's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
AFGR vs. CIBR - Dividend Comparison
AFGR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CIBR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.48%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AFGR First Trust Active Factor Large Cap Growth ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.25% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
CIBR First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF | 0.48% | 0.42% | 0.29% | 0.42% | 0.31% | 0.59% | 1.10% | 0.23% | 0.23% | 0.10% | 0.77% | 0.58% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AFGR and CIBR have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CIBR has higher volatility (12.35%) compared to AFGR (5.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AFGR dropped -45.97% vs CIBR's -33.89%.
On 5-year performance, CIBR leads with 13.58% vs 7.22% for AFGR. On fees, CIBR is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, AFGR has been the lower-risk option at 5.45%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, CIBR has performed better with a 13.58% return vs 7.22%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
CIBR is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for AFGR.
CIBR has the higher dividend yield at 0.48%, compared with 0.00% for AFGR.
AFGR is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while CIBR is Cybersecurity. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for AFGR and 0.60% for CIBR.
CIBR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.69 vs 0.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AFGR and CIBR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer