PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AESR vs. SCHB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AESR vs. SCHB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Anfield U.S. Equity Sector Rotation ETF (AESR) and Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF (SCHB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AESR achieves a 20.98% return, which is significantly higher than SCHB's 11.28% return.


AESR

1D
-0.05%
1M
7.94%
YTD
20.98%
6M
21.17%
1Y
39.18%
3Y*
26.82%
5Y*
15.28%
10Y*

SCHB

1D
-0.72%
1M
5.01%
YTD
11.28%
6M
11.12%
1Y
28.12%
3Y*
22.11%
5Y*
12.76%
10Y*
15.04%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AESR vs. SCHB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
AESR
Anfield U.S. Equity Sector Rotation ETF
20.98%20.34%25.37%21.03%-17.52%25.26%19.58%0.76%
SCHB
Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF
11.28%16.94%23.93%26.16%-19.46%25.84%20.76%1.14%

Correlation

The correlation between AESR and SCHB is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 18, 2019

0.94

The correlation between AESR and SCHB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

AESR vs. SCHB - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
AESR
SCHB

Technology

33.8%
34.4%

Communication Services

26.0%
10.1%

Consumer Cyclical

12.8%
10.1%

Industrials

10.6%
9.4%

Financial Services

7.0%
12.2%

Basic Materials

2.7%
2.0%

Consumer Defensive

2.4%
4.6%

Energy

2.1%
3.7%

Healthcare

2.0%
8.9%

Utilities

0.3%
2.3%

Real Estate

0.3%
2.4%

Technology

AESR
33.8%
SCHB
34.4%

Communication Services

AESR
26.0%
SCHB
10.1%

Consumer Cyclical

AESR
12.8%
SCHB
10.1%

Industrials

AESR
10.6%
SCHB
9.4%

Financial Services

AESR
7.0%
SCHB
12.2%

Basic Materials

AESR
2.7%
SCHB
2.0%

Consumer Defensive

AESR
2.4%
SCHB
4.6%

Energy

AESR
2.1%
SCHB
3.7%

Healthcare

AESR
2.0%
SCHB
8.9%

Utilities

AESR
0.3%
SCHB
2.3%

Real Estate

AESR
0.3%
SCHB
2.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AESR vs. SCHB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AESR
AESR Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
AESR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AESR Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
AESR Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
AESR Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
AESR Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

SCHB
SCHB Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
SCHB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHB Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHB Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHB Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHB Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AESR vs. SCHB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Anfield U.S. Equity Sector Rotation ETF (AESR) and Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF (SCHB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AESRSCHBDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.40

2.33

+0.07

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.20

3.19

+0.01

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.42

0.00

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

4.01

3.17

+0.84

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

16.87

14.55

+2.33

AESR vs. SCHB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AESR Sharpe Ratio is 2.40, which is comparable to the SCHB Sharpe Ratio of 2.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AESR and SCHB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AESRSCHBDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.40

2.33

+0.07

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.86

0.74

+0.12

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.82

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.83

0.83

0.00

Drawdowns

AESR vs. SCHB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AESR drawdown since its inception was -31.06%, smaller than the maximum SCHB drawdown of -35.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AESR and SCHB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AESRSCHBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.06%

-35.27%

+4.21%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.82%

-8.91%

-0.91%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.85%

-19.34%

-0.51%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.04%

-25.41%

+0.37%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.27%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.05%

-0.72%

+0.67%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.02%

-4.12%

-1.90%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.33%

1.94%

+0.39%

Volatility

AESR vs. SCHB - Volatility Comparison

Anfield U.S. Equity Sector Rotation ETF (AESR) has a higher volatility of 5.52% compared to Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF (SCHB) at 3.01%. This indicates that AESR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AESRSCHBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.52%

3.01%

+2.51%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.73%

9.14%

+3.59%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.39%

12.12%

+4.27%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.83%

17.24%

+0.59%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.44%

18.32%

+2.12%

AESR vs. SCHB - Expense Ratio Comparison

AESR has a 1.46% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHB's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

AESR vs. SCHB - Dividend Comparison

AESR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 19.03%, more than SCHB's 1.02% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AESR
Anfield U.S. Equity Sector Rotation ETF
19.03%23.02%0.17%0.33%0.73%6.59%1.06%0.33%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SCHB
Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF
1.02%1.11%1.24%1.40%1.61%1.21%1.63%1.80%2.00%1.65%1.86%2.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, AESR and SCHB move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

AESR has higher volatility (5.52%) compared to SCHB (3.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AESR dropped -31.06% vs SCHB's -35.27%.

On 5-year performance, AESR leads with 15.28% vs 12.76% for SCHB. On fees, SCHB is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, SCHB has been the lower-risk option at 3.01%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, AESR has performed better with a 15.28% return vs 12.76%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SCHB is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 1.46% for AESR.

AESR has the higher dividend yield at 19.03%, compared with 1.02% for SCHB.

AESR is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while SCHB is Large Cap Blend Equities. They also come from different issuers: Regents Park Funds and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 1.46% for AESR and 0.03% for SCHB.

AESR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.40 vs 2.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AESR and SCHB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer