AESR vs. QARP

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

AESR (Anfield U.S. Equity Sector Rotation ETF) and QARP (Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Quality at a Reasonable Price ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. AESR is actively managed, while QARP is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, AESR returned 13.97%/yr vs 12.09%/yr for QARP. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. AESR charges 1.46%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for QARP.

Performance

AESR vs. QARP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Anfield U.S. Equity Sector Rotation ETF (AESR) and Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Quality at a Reasonable Price ETF (QARP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AESR achieves a 16.79% return, which is significantly higher than QARP's 12.78% return.

AESR

• 1D: -1.25%
• 1M: -2.94%
• 6M: 12.24%
• YTD: 16.79%
• 1Y: 26.85%
• 3Y*: 23.27%
• 5Y*: 13.97%
• 10Y*: —

QARP

• 1D: 0.71%
• 1M: 1.10%
• 6M: 9.34%
• YTD: 12.78%
• 1Y: 25.00%
• 3Y*: 17.33%
• 5Y*: 12.09%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AESR vs. QARP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
AESR Anfield U.S. Equity Sector Rotation ETF	16.79%	20.34%	25.37%	21.03%	-17.52%	25.26%	19.58%	0.76%
QARP Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Quality at a Reasonable Price ETF	12.78%	13.99%	18.94%	23.03%	-14.62%	31.82%	14.83%	0.78%

Correlation

The correlation between AESR and QARP is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.77
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.81
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.87
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 17, 2019	0.87

The correlation between AESR and QARP shifts across timeframes, from 0.77 (1 year) to 0.87 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

AESR vs. QARP - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	AESR	QARP
Technology	40.4%	23.5%
Communication Services	24.5%	11.3%
Consumer Cyclical	12.3%	9.6%
Industrials	8.4%	8.5%
Financial Services	6.7%	12.1%
Consumer Defensive	2.2%	9.6%
Healthcare	2.0%	13.9%
Energy	1.8%	5.8%
Basic Materials	1.2%	2.3%
Utilities	0.3%	2.0%
Real Estate	0.3%	1.0%

Return for Risk

AESR vs. QARP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AESR

AESR Risk / Return Rank: 58
AESR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 52
AESR Sortino Ratio Rank: 49
AESR Omega Ratio Rank: 50
AESR Calmar Ratio Rank: 68
AESR Martin Ratio Rank: 73

QARP

QARP Risk / Return Rank: 87
QARP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 90
QARP Sortino Ratio Rank: 89
QARP Omega Ratio Rank: 88
QARP Calmar Ratio Rank: 82
QARP Martin Ratio Rank: 89

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AESR vs. QARP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Anfield U.S. Equity Sector Rotation ETF (AESR) and Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Quality at a Reasonable Price ETF (QARP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	AESR	QARP	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.43	2.38	-0.94
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.97	3.34	-1.36
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.26	1.43	-0.17
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.75	3.46	-0.71
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.59	15.38	-4.79

AESR vs. QARP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AESR Sharpe Ratio is 1.43, which is lower than the QARP Sharpe Ratio of 2.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AESR and QARP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

AESR vs. QARP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AESR drawdown since its inception was -31.06%, smaller than the maximum QARP drawdown of -35.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AESR and QARP.

Drawdown Indicators

	AESR	QARP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-31.06%	-35.44%	+4.38%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.82%	-7.26%	-2.56%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.85%	-15.65%	-4.20%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.04%	-22.75%	-2.29%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.85%	0.00%	-4.85%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.95%	-4.39%	-1.56%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.54%	1.63%	+0.91%

Volatility

AESR vs. QARP - Volatility Comparison

Anfield U.S. Equity Sector Rotation ETF (AESR) has a higher volatility of 7.39% compared to Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Quality at a Reasonable Price ETF (QARP) at 2.76%. This indicates that AESR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QARP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AESR	QARP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.39%	2.76%	+4.63%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.86%	8.22%	+7.64%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.81%	10.58%	+8.23%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.36%	15.54%	+2.82%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.64%	19.55%	+1.09%

AESR vs. QARP - Expense Ratio Comparison

AESR has a 1.46% expense ratio, which is higher than QARP's 0.19% expense ratio.

Dividends

AESR vs. QARP - Dividend Comparison

AESR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 19.71%, more than QARP's 1.02% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
AESR Anfield U.S. Equity Sector Rotation ETF	19.71%	23.02%	0.17%	0.33%	0.73%	6.59%	1.06%	0.33%	0.00%
QARP Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Quality at a Reasonable Price ETF	1.02%	1.14%	1.39%	1.28%	1.68%	1.34%	1.61%	1.85%	1.39%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AESR and QARP in my portfolio?

AESR and QARP have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, AESR or QARP?

AESR has higher volatility (7.39%) compared to QARP (2.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AESR dropped -31.06% vs QARP's -35.44%.

Which ETF is better, AESR or QARP?

On 5-year performance, AESR leads with 13.97% vs 12.09% for QARP. On fees, QARP is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, QARP has been the lower-risk option at 2.76%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, AESR or QARP?

Over the 5-year period, AESR has performed better with a 13.97% return vs 12.09%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, AESR or QARP?

QARP is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 1.46% for AESR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, AESR or QARP?

AESR has the higher dividend yield at 19.71%, compared with 1.02% for QARP.

What is the main difference between AESR and QARP?

They also come from different issuers: Regents Park Funds and Deutsche Bank. Their fees differ too: 1.46% for AESR and 0.19% for QARP.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QARP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.38 vs 1.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.