AESR vs. FMTM

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

AESR (Anfield U.S. Equity Sector Rotation ETF) and FMTM (MarketDesk Focused U.S. Momentum ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - AESR is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by Regents Park Funds, while FMTM is a Momentum fund. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, AESR returned 33.70% vs 61.05% for FMTM. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. AESR charges 1.46%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for FMTM.

Performance

AESR vs. FMTM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Anfield U.S. Equity Sector Rotation ETF (AESR) and MarketDesk Focused U.S. Momentum ETF (FMTM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AESR achieves a 18.68% return, which is significantly lower than FMTM's 30.53% return.

AESR

• 1D: -3.27%
• 1M: 1.72%
• YTD: 18.68%
• 6M: 17.04%
• 1Y: 33.70%
• 3Y*: 25.33%
• 5Y*: 14.60%
• 10Y*: —

FMTM

• 1D: -3.43%
• 1M: 4.31%
• YTD: 30.53%
• 6M: 28.10%
• 1Y: 61.05%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AESR vs. FMTM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
AESR Anfield U.S. Equity Sector Rotation ETF	18.68%	25.00%
FMTM MarketDesk Focused U.S. Momentum ETF	30.53%	28.21%

Correlation

The correlation between AESR and FMTM is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.81
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 20, 2025	0.74

The correlation between AESR and FMTM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.74 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

AESR vs. FMTM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AESR

AESR Risk / Return Rank: 65
AESR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 60
AESR Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
AESR Omega Ratio Rank: 59
AESR Calmar Ratio Rank: 72
AESR Martin Ratio Rank: 78

FMTM

FMTM Risk / Return Rank: 81
FMTM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 82
FMTM Sortino Ratio Rank: 72
FMTM Omega Ratio Rank: 74
FMTM Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
FMTM Martin Ratio Rank: 89

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AESR vs. FMTM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Anfield U.S. Equity Sector Rotation ETF (AESR) and MarketDesk Focused U.S. Momentum ETF (FMTM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	AESR	FMTM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.86	2.53	-0.67
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.48	3.09	-0.61
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.34	1.42	-0.08
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.45	5.06	-1.61
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.98	19.29	-5.31

AESR vs. FMTM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AESR Sharpe Ratio is 1.86, which is comparable to the FMTM Sharpe Ratio of 2.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AESR and FMTM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

AESR vs. FMTM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AESR drawdown since its inception was -31.06%, which is greater than FMTM's maximum drawdown of -12.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AESR and FMTM.

Drawdown Indicators

	AESR	FMTM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-31.06%	-12.12%	-18.94%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.82%	-12.12%	+2.30%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.85%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.04%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.32%	-3.43%	+0.11%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.98%	-1.91%	-4.07%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.42%	3.17%	-0.75%

Volatility

AESR vs. FMTM - Volatility Comparison

Anfield U.S. Equity Sector Rotation ETF (AESR) and MarketDesk Focused U.S. Momentum ETF (FMTM) have volatilities of 9.07% and 9.38%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AESR	FMTM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.07%	9.38%	-0.31%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.09%	19.05%	-3.96%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.23%	24.27%	-6.04%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.21%	23.68%	-5.47%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.63%	23.68%	-3.05%

AESR vs. FMTM - Expense Ratio Comparison

AESR has a 1.46% expense ratio, which is higher than FMTM's 0.45% expense ratio.

Dividends

AESR vs. FMTM - Dividend Comparison

AESR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 19.39%, more than FMTM's 0.23% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
AESR Anfield U.S. Equity Sector Rotation ETF	19.39%	23.02%	0.17%	0.33%	0.73%	6.59%	1.06%	0.33%
FMTM MarketDesk Focused U.S. Momentum ETF	0.23%	0.30%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AESR and FMTM in my portfolio?

AESR and FMTM have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, AESR or FMTM?

FMTM has higher volatility (9.38%) compared to AESR (9.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AESR dropped -31.06% vs FMTM's -12.12%.

Which ETF is better, AESR or FMTM?

On 1-year performance, FMTM leads with 61.05% vs 33.70% for AESR. On fees, FMTM is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, AESR has been the lower-risk option at 9.07%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, AESR or FMTM?

Over the 1-year period, FMTM has performed better with a 61.05% return vs 33.70%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, AESR or FMTM?

FMTM is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 1.46% for AESR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, AESR or FMTM?

AESR has the higher dividend yield at 19.39%, compared with 0.23% for FMTM.

What is the main difference between AESR and FMTM?

AESR is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while FMTM is Momentum. Their fees differ too: 1.46% for AESR and 0.45% for FMTM.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FMTM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.53 vs 1.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.