AESR vs. DLN
AESR (Anfield U.S. Equity Sector Rotation ETF) and DLN (WisdomTree US LargeCap Dividend ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. AESR is actively managed, while DLN is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, AESR returned 15.28%/yr vs 12.22%/yr for DLN. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. AESR charges 1.46%/yr vs 0.28%/yr for DLN.
Performance
AESR vs. DLN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AESR achieves a 20.98% return, which is significantly higher than DLN's 9.93% return.
AESR
- 1D
- -0.05%
- 1M
- 7.94%
- YTD
- 20.98%
- 6M
- 21.17%
- 1Y
- 39.18%
- 3Y*
- 26.82%
- 5Y*
- 15.28%
- 10Y*
- —
DLN
- 1D
- -0.51%
- 1M
- 2.93%
- YTD
- 9.93%
- 6M
- 9.96%
- 1Y
- 22.38%
- 3Y*
- 18.35%
- 5Y*
- 12.22%
- 10Y*
- 12.68%
AESR vs. DLN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AESR Anfield U.S. Equity Sector Rotation ETF | 20.98% | 20.34% | 25.37% | 21.03% | -17.52% | 25.26% | 19.58% | 0.76% |
DLN WisdomTree US LargeCap Dividend ETF | 9.93% | 15.53% | 19.66% | 9.95% | -3.78% | 25.60% | 4.59% | 1.01% |
Correlation
The correlation between AESR and DLN is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 18, 2019 | 0.82 |
The correlation between AESR and DLN shifts across timeframes, from 0.71 (1 year) to 0.82 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
AESR vs. DLN - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
AESR
DLN
Technology
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Financial Services
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Healthcare
Utilities
Real Estate
Technology
AESR
DLN
Communication Services
AESR
DLN
Consumer Cyclical
AESR
DLN
Industrials
AESR
DLN
Financial Services
AESR
DLN
Basic Materials
AESR
DLN
Consumer Defensive
AESR
DLN
Energy
AESR
DLN
Healthcare
AESR
DLN
Utilities
AESR
DLN
Real Estate
AESR
DLN
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AESR vs. DLN — Risk / Return Rank
AESR
DLN
AESR vs. DLN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Anfield U.S. Equity Sector Rotation ETF (AESR) and WisdomTree US LargeCap Dividend ETF (DLN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AESR | DLN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.40 | 2.53 | -0.13 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.20 | 3.64 | -0.44 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.46 | -0.03 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.01 | 3.69 | +0.32 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.87 | 15.59 | +1.29 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AESR | DLN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.40 | 2.53 | -0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.86 | 0.93 | -0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.79 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.83 | 0.53 | +0.30 |
Drawdowns
AESR vs. DLN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AESR drawdown since its inception was -31.06%, smaller than the maximum DLN drawdown of -57.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AESR and DLN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AESR | DLN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.06% | -57.84% | +26.78% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.82% | -6.10% | -3.72% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.85% | -13.71% | -6.14% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.04% | -16.26% | -8.78% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.82% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.05% | -0.51% | +0.46% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.02% | -7.52% | +1.50% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.33% | 1.44% | +0.89% |
Volatility
AESR vs. DLN - Volatility Comparison
Anfield U.S. Equity Sector Rotation ETF (AESR) has a higher volatility of 5.52% compared to WisdomTree US LargeCap Dividend ETF (DLN) at 2.17%. This indicates that AESR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DLN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AESR | DLN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.52% | 2.17% | +3.35% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.73% | 6.77% | +5.96% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.39% | 8.87% | +7.52% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.83% | 13.26% | +4.57% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.44% | 16.16% | +4.28% |
AESR vs. DLN - Expense Ratio Comparison
AESR has a 1.46% expense ratio, which is higher than DLN's 0.28% expense ratio.
Dividends
AESR vs. DLN - Dividend Comparison
AESR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 19.03%, more than DLN's 1.79% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AESR Anfield U.S. Equity Sector Rotation ETF | 19.03% | 23.02% | 0.17% | 0.33% | 0.73% | 6.59% | 1.06% | 0.33% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
DLN WisdomTree US LargeCap Dividend ETF | 1.79% | 1.90% | 2.00% | 2.43% | 2.53% | 2.01% | 2.66% | 2.51% | 2.90% | 2.33% | 2.64% | 2.80% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AESR and DLN have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AESR has higher volatility (5.52%) compared to DLN (2.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AESR dropped -31.06% vs DLN's -57.84%.
On 5-year performance, AESR leads with 15.28% vs 12.22% for DLN. On fees, DLN is cheaper at 0.28% per year. On volatility, DLN has been the lower-risk option at 2.17%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, AESR has performed better with a 15.28% return vs 12.22%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DLN is cheaper with a 0.28% expense ratio, compared with 1.46% for AESR.
AESR has the higher dividend yield at 19.03%, compared with 1.79% for DLN.
They also come from different issuers: Regents Park Funds and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 1.46% for AESR and 0.28% for DLN.
DLN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.53 vs 2.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AESR and DLN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer