PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AESR vs. BIBL
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

AESR vs. BIBL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Anfield U.S. Equity Sector Rotation ETF (AESR) and Inspire 100 ETF (BIBL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

AESR vs. BIBL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
AESR
Anfield U.S. Equity Sector Rotation ETF
0.40%20.34%25.37%21.03%-17.52%25.26%19.58%0.76%
BIBL
Inspire 100 ETF
6.48%17.27%12.49%17.87%-23.26%27.44%22.62%1.69%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AESR achieves a 0.40% return, which is significantly lower than BIBL's 6.48% return.


AESR

1D
-0.06%
1M
-4.00%
YTD
0.40%
6M
1.42%
1Y
31.17%
3Y*
20.16%
5Y*
12.19%
10Y*

BIBL

1D
0.36%
1M
-3.18%
YTD
6.48%
6M
6.94%
1Y
32.13%
3Y*
16.45%
5Y*
8.45%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


AESR vs. BIBL - Expense Ratio Comparison

AESR has a 1.46% expense ratio, which is higher than BIBL's 0.35% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

AESR vs. BIBL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AESR
AESR Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
AESR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AESR Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
AESR Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
AESR Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
AESR Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

BIBL
BIBL Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
BIBL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BIBL Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
BIBL Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
BIBL Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
BIBL Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AESR vs. BIBL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Anfield U.S. Equity Sector Rotation ETF (AESR) and Inspire 100 ETF (BIBL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AESRBIBLDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.19

1.20

-0.02

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.74

1.73

+0.01

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.25

0.00

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.10

1.85

+0.25

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.90

8.71

+0.19

AESR vs. BIBL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AESR Sharpe Ratio is 1.19, which is comparable to the BIBL Sharpe Ratio of 1.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AESR and BIBL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AESRBIBLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.19

1.20

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.69

0.44

+0.26

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.69

0.54

+0.15

Correlation

The correlation between AESR and BIBL is 0.87, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

AESR vs. BIBL - Dividend Comparison

AESR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 22.93%, more than BIBL's 1.11% yield.


TTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
AESR
Anfield U.S. Equity Sector Rotation ETF
22.93%23.02%0.17%0.33%0.73%6.59%1.06%0.33%0.00%0.00%
BIBL
Inspire 100 ETF
1.11%1.01%0.92%1.02%0.98%17.87%1.67%1.30%1.49%0.31%

Drawdowns

AESR vs. BIBL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AESR drawdown since its inception was -31.06%, smaller than the maximum BIBL drawdown of -36.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AESR and BIBL.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


AESRBIBLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.06%

-36.12%

+5.06%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.82%

-8.94%

-0.88%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.04%

-30.85%

+5.81%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.02%

-4.62%

-0.40%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.16%

-7.16%

+1.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.89%

2.96%

-0.07%

Volatility

AESR vs. BIBL - Volatility Comparison

Anfield U.S. Equity Sector Rotation ETF (AESR) and Inspire 100 ETF (BIBL) have volatilities of 7.04% and 6.75%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


AESRBIBLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.04%

6.75%

+0.29%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.06%

12.28%

+0.78%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.63%

20.39%

+0.24%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.65%

19.44%

-1.79%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.50%

21.14%

-0.64%