AESI vs. MLECW
AESI (Atlas Energy Solutions Inc) and MLECW (Moolec Science SA Warrant) are both stocks. AESI operates in Oil & Gas Equipment & Services (Energy), while MLECW operates in Biotechnology (Healthcare). Over the past 3 years, AESI returned 0.62%/yr vs -41.05%/yr for MLECW. At a 0.05 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
AESI vs. MLECW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AESI achieves a 71.97% return, which is significantly lower than MLECW's 165.52% return.
AESI
- 1D
- 0.75%
- 1M
- -15.05%
- YTD
- 71.97%
- 6M
- 75.90%
- 1Y
- 14.88%
- 3Y*
- 0.62%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MLECW
- 1D
- -14.92%
- 1M
- -23.00%
- YTD
- 165.52%
- 6M
- 52.48%
- 1Y
- -8.33%
- 3Y*
- -41.05%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AESI vs. MLECW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
AESI Atlas Energy Solutions Inc | 71.97% | -55.28% | 34.96% | 2.24% |
MLECW Moolec Science SA Warrant | 165.52% | -77.17% | 15.45% | -86.85% |
Correlation
The correlation between AESI and MLECW is 0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.04 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.05 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 9, 2023 | 0.05 |
Fundamentals
AESI:
$1.06B
MLECW:
$7.83M
AESI:
$87.21M
MLECW:
-$639.50K
AESI:
$87.71M
MLECW:
-$5.21M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AESI vs. MLECW — Risk / Return Rank
AESI
MLECW
AESI vs. MLECW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Atlas Energy Solutions Inc (AESI) and Moolec Science SA Warrant (MLECW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AESI | MLECW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.26 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.68 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.09 | 1.30 | -0.21 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.32 | -0.11 | +0.43 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.67 | -0.18 | +0.85 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AESI vs. MLECW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AESI drawdown since its inception was -65.91%, smaller than the maximum MLECW drawdown of -99.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AESI and MLECW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AESI | MLECW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -65.91% | -99.71% | +33.80% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -42.68% | -75.63% | +32.95% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -65.91% | -94.66% | +28.75% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -31.83% | -99.06% | +67.23% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -25.37% | -97.25% | +71.88% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 20.73% | 47.13% | -26.40% |
Volatility
AESI vs. MLECW - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Atlas Energy Solutions Inc (AESI) is 17.11%, while Moolec Science SA Warrant (MLECW) has a volatility of 40.86%. This indicates that AESI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MLECW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AESI | MLECW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 17.11% | 40.86% | -23.75% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 40.61% | 216.31% | -175.70% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 59.52% | 288.88% | -229.36% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 48.51% | 306.73% | -258.22% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 48.51% | 306.73% | -258.22% |
Dividends
AESI vs. MLECW - Dividend Comparison
AESI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.54%, while MLECW has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
AESI Atlas Energy Solutions Inc | 1.54% | 7.96% | 4.33% | 4.07% |
MLECW Moolec Science SA Warrant | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
AESI vs. MLECW - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Atlas Energy Solutions Inc and Moolec Science SA Warrant. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
AESI and MLECW have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MLECW has higher volatility (40.86%) compared to AESI (17.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AESI dropped -65.91% vs MLECW's -99.71%.
AESI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.23 vs -0.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AESI and MLECW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer