MLECW vs. CIFR
MLECW (Moolec Science SA Warrant) and CIFR (Cipher Digital Inc.) are both stocks. MLECW operates in Biotechnology (Healthcare), while CIFR operates in Information Technology Services (Technology). Over the past 3 years, MLECW returned -37.99%/yr vs 84.92%/yr for CIFR. Their -0.05 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past.
Performance
MLECW vs. CIFR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MLECW achieves a 184.48% return, which is significantly higher than CIFR's 51.22% return.
MLECW
- 1D
- -4.62%
- 1M
- 0.61%
- 6M
- 89.66%
- YTD
- 184.48%
- 1Y
- -11.76%
- 3Y*
- -37.99%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -72.35%
CIFR
- 1D
- -1.48%
- 1M
- 11.38%
- 6M
- 39.85%
- YTD
- 51.22%
- 1Y
- 352.74%
- 3Y*
- 84.92%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 17.24%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $699.13M | $580.45M | $601.55M | |
| $1.13K | $640.73 | $1.66K |
MLECW vs. CIFR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
MLECW Moolec Science SA Warrant | 184.48% | -77.17% | 15.45% | -98.65% |
CIFR Cipher Digital Inc. | 51.22% | 218.10% | 12.35% | 637.50% |
Correlation
The correlation between MLECW and CIFR is -0.04, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.04 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | -0.03 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2023 | -0.05 |
Fundamentals
MLECW:
$179.72K
CIFR:
$9.13B
MLECW:
$7.83M
CIFR:
$174.98M
MLECW:
-$639.50K
CIFR:
-$172.84M
MLECW:
-$5.21M
CIFR:
-$169.22M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MLECW vs. CIFR — Risk / Return Rank
MLECW
CIFR
MLECW vs. CIFR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Moolec Science SA Warrant (MLECW) and Cipher Digital Inc. (CIFR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MLECW | CIFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.74 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.68 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.35 | -0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.16 | 6.06 | -6.21 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.23 | 11.90 | -12.13 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MLECW vs. CIFR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MLECW drawdown since its inception was -99.71%, roughly equal to the maximum CIFR drawdown of -97.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MLECW and CIFR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MLECW | CIFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.71% | -97.16% | -2.55% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -75.87% | -51.38% | -24.49% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -94.51% | -71.74% | -22.77% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -98.99% | -23.51% | -75.48% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -97.31% | -65.01% | -32.30% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 51.71% | 26.14% | +25.57% |
Volatility
MLECW vs. CIFR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Moolec Science SA Warrant (MLECW) is 42.17%, while Cipher Digital Inc. (CIFR) has a volatility of 46.50%. This indicates that MLECW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CIFR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MLECW | CIFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 42.17% | 46.50% | -4.33% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 180.44% | 79.79% | +100.65% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 285.65% | 115.46% | +170.19% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 302.96% | 122.42% | +180.54% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 302.96% | 122.42% | +180.54% |
Dividends
MLECW vs. CIFR - Dividend Comparison
Neither MLECW nor CIFR has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
MLECW vs. CIFR - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Moolec Science SA Warrant and Cipher Digital Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
MLECW and CIFR have a correlation of -0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CIFR has higher volatility (46.50%) compared to MLECW (42.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MLECW dropped -99.71% vs CIFR's -97.16%.
CIFR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.69 vs -0.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MLECW and CIFR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer