MLECW vs. AUGO
MLECW (Moolec Science SA Warrant) and AUGO (Aura Minerals Inc. Common Shares) are both stocks. MLECW operates in Biotechnology (Healthcare), while AUGO operates in Gold (Basic Materials). Over the past year, MLECW returned -11.76% vs 134.38% for AUGO. Their 0.12 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
MLECW vs. AUGO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MLECW achieves a 184.48% return, which is significantly higher than AUGO's 10.23% return.
MLECW
- 1D
- -4.62%
- 1M
- 0.61%
- 6M
- 89.66%
- YTD
- 184.48%
- 1Y
- -11.76%
- 3Y*
- -37.99%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -72.35%
AUGO
- 1D
- -4.18%
- 1M
- -16.64%
- 6M
- -12.75%
- YTD
- 10.23%
- 1Y
- 134.38%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 125.15%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $35.08M | $50.97M | $65.65M | |
| $1.13K | $640.73 | $1.66K |
MLECW vs. AUGO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
MLECW Moolec Science SA Warrant | 184.48% | -61.07% |
AUGO Aura Minerals Inc. Common Shares | 10.23% | 111.07% |
Correlation
The correlation between MLECW and AUGO is 0.13, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.13 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 16, 2025 | 0.12 |
Fundamentals
MLECW:
$179.72K
AUGO:
$4.57B
MLECW:
$7.83M
AUGO:
$1.14B
MLECW:
-$639.50K
AUGO:
$644.49M
MLECW:
-$5.21M
AUGO:
$394.37M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MLECW vs. AUGO — Risk / Return Rank
MLECW
AUGO
MLECW vs. AUGO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Moolec Science SA Warrant (MLECW) and Aura Minerals Inc. Common Shares (AUGO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MLECW | AUGO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.95 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.07 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.29 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.16 | 2.51 | -2.67 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.23 | 6.15 | -6.38 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MLECW vs. AUGO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MLECW drawdown since its inception was -99.71%, which is greater than AUGO's maximum drawdown of -53.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MLECW and AUGO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MLECW | AUGO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.71% | -53.65% | -46.06% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -75.87% | -53.65% | -22.22% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -94.51% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -98.99% | -49.48% | -49.51% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -97.31% | -13.88% | -83.43% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 51.71% | 21.85% | +29.86% |
Volatility
MLECW vs. AUGO - Volatility Comparison
Moolec Science SA Warrant (MLECW) has a higher volatility of 42.17% compared to Aura Minerals Inc. Common Shares (AUGO) at 25.65%. This indicates that MLECW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AUGO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MLECW | AUGO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 42.17% | 25.65% | +16.52% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 180.44% | 59.99% | +120.45% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 285.65% | 70.43% | +215.22% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 302.96% | 69.38% | +233.58% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 302.96% | 69.38% | +233.58% |
Dividends
MLECW vs. AUGO - Dividend Comparison
MLECW has not paid dividends to shareholders, while AUGO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.12%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
AUGO Aura Minerals Inc. Common Shares | 4.12% | 1.61% |
MLECW Moolec Science SA Warrant | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
MLECW vs. AUGO - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Moolec Science SA Warrant and Aura Minerals Inc. Common Shares. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
MLECW and AUGO have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MLECW has higher volatility (42.17%) compared to AUGO (25.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MLECW dropped -99.71% vs AUGO's -53.65%.
AUGO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.91 vs -0.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MLECW and AUGO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer