AESI vs. BOIL
AESI (Atlas Energy Solutions Inc) is a stock, while BOIL (ProShares Ultra Bloomberg Natural Gas) is Leveraged Commodities fund tracking the Bloomberg Natural Gas Subindex. Over the past 3 years, AESI returned 5.74%/yr vs -60.61%/yr for BOIL. At a 0.05 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
AESI vs. BOIL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AESI achieves a 90.13% return, which is significantly higher than BOIL's -36.77% return.
AESI
- 1D
- -0.72%
- 1M
- 0.90%
- YTD
- 90.13%
- 6M
- 84.64%
- 1Y
- 41.12%
- 3Y*
- 5.74%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BOIL
- 1D
- 4.32%
- 1M
- 4.62%
- YTD
- -36.77%
- 6M
- -62.98%
- 1Y
- -74.31%
- 3Y*
- -60.61%
- 5Y*
- -64.63%
- 10Y*
- -56.95%
AESI vs. BOIL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
AESI Atlas Energy Solutions Inc | 90.13% | -55.28% | 34.96% | 5.56% |
BOIL ProShares Ultra Bloomberg Natural Gas | -36.77% | -58.98% | -60.75% | -73.76% |
Correlation
The correlation between AESI and BOIL is -0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.01 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.04 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 10, 2023 | 0.05 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AESI vs. BOIL — Risk / Return Rank
AESI
BOIL
AESI vs. BOIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Atlas Energy Solutions Inc (AESI) and ProShares Ultra Bloomberg Natural Gas (BOIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AESI | BOIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.36 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.07 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 0.90 | +0.26 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.95 | -0.92 | +1.87 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.98 | -1.26 | +3.24 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AESI | BOIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.70 | -0.66 | +1.36 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | -0.55 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | -0.56 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.13 | -0.61 | +0.74 |
Drawdowns
AESI vs. BOIL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AESI drawdown since its inception was -65.91%, smaller than the maximum BOIL drawdown of -100.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AESI and BOIL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AESI | BOIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -65.91% | -100.00% | +34.09% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -43.54% | -80.85% | +37.31% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -65.91% | -96.86% | +30.95% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -99.91% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -99.99% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -24.63% | -100.00% | +75.37% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -25.28% | -93.59% | +68.31% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 20.81% | 59.20% | -38.39% |
Volatility
AESI vs. BOIL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Atlas Energy Solutions Inc (AESI) is 16.46%, while ProShares Ultra Bloomberg Natural Gas (BOIL) has a volatility of 23.95%. This indicates that AESI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BOIL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AESI | BOIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 16.46% | 23.95% | -7.49% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 40.31% | 107.61% | -67.30% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 59.02% | 113.64% | -54.62% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 48.35% | 118.89% | -70.54% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 48.35% | 101.81% | -53.46% |
Dividends
AESI vs. BOIL - Dividend Comparison
AESI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.40%, while BOIL has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
AESI Atlas Energy Solutions Inc | 1.40% | 7.96% | 4.33% | 4.07% |
BOIL ProShares Ultra Bloomberg Natural Gas | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AESI and BOIL have a correlation of -0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BOIL has higher volatility (23.95%) compared to AESI (16.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AESI dropped -65.91% vs BOIL's -100.00%.
AESI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.70 vs -0.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AESI and BOIL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer