MLECW vs. AG
MLECW (Moolec Science SA Warrant) and AG (First Majestic Silver Corp.) are both stocks. MLECW operates in Biotechnology (Healthcare), while AG operates in Silver (Basic Materials). Over the past 3 years, MLECW returned -34.96%/yr vs 49.83%/yr for AG. At a 0.03 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
MLECW vs. AG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MLECW achieves a 268.98% return, which is significantly higher than AG's 18.81% return.
MLECW
- 1D
- 26.63%
- 1M
- -6.95%
- YTD
- 268.98%
- 6M
- 76.87%
- 1Y
- 122.93%
- 3Y*
- -34.96%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AG
- 1D
- -5.81%
- 1M
- 2.11%
- YTD
- 18.81%
- 6M
- 26.15%
- 1Y
- 181.03%
- 3Y*
- 49.83%
- 5Y*
- 2.67%
- 10Y*
- 5.48%
MLECW vs. AG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
MLECW Moolec Science SA Warrant | 268.98% | -77.17% | 15.45% | -89.52% |
AG First Majestic Silver Corp. | 18.81% | 204.32% | -10.47% | -26.60% |
Correlation
The correlation between MLECW and AG is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.04 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2023 | 0.03 |
Fundamentals
MLECW:
$7.83M
AG:
$1.49B
MLECW:
-$639.50K
AG:
$646.49M
MLECW:
-$5.21M
AG:
$824.25M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MLECW vs. AG — Risk / Return Rank
MLECW
AG
MLECW vs. AG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Moolec Science SA Warrant (MLECW) and First Majestic Silver Corp. (AG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MLECW | AG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.08 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.39 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.41 | 1.35 | +0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.63 | 4.24 | -2.61 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.76 | 9.46 | -6.70 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MLECW | AG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.41 | 2.49 | -2.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.04 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.09 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.16 | 0.05 | -0.21 |
Drawdowns
MLECW vs. AG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MLECW drawdown since its inception was -97.82%, which is greater than AG's maximum drawdown of -90.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MLECW and AG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MLECW | AG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -97.82% | -90.20% | -7.62% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -75.63% | -42.92% | -32.71% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -94.66% | -42.92% | -51.74% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -76.89% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -80.82% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -90.27% | -38.18% | -52.09% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -79.43% | -59.21% | -20.22% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 44.77% | 19.23% | +25.54% |
Volatility
MLECW vs. AG - Volatility Comparison
Moolec Science SA Warrant (MLECW) has a higher volatility of 44.33% compared to First Majestic Silver Corp. (AG) at 22.62%. This indicates that MLECW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MLECW | AG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 44.33% | 22.62% | +21.71% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 214.82% | 56.05% | +158.77% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 300.75% | 73.23% | +227.52% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 304.70% | 61.33% | +243.37% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 304.70% | 61.84% | +242.86% |
Dividends
MLECW vs. AG - Dividend Comparison
MLECW has not paid dividends to shareholders, while AG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.18%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AG First Majestic Silver Corp. | 0.18% | 0.12% | 0.33% | 0.34% | 0.31% | 0.14% |
MLECW Moolec Science SA Warrant | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
MLECW vs. AG - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Moolec Science SA Warrant and First Majestic Silver Corp.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
MLECW and AG have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MLECW has higher volatility (44.33%) compared to AG (22.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MLECW dropped -97.82% vs AG's -90.20%.
AG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.49 vs 0.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MLECW and AG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer