PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AESI vs. NRG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

AESI vs. NRG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Atlas Energy Solutions Inc (AESI) and NRG Energy, Inc. (NRG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AESI achieves a 93.74% return, which is significantly higher than NRG's -15.71% return.


AESI

1D
1.90%
1M
-5.05%
YTD
93.74%
6M
81.59%
1Y
43.58%
3Y*
6.60%
5Y*
10Y*

NRG

1D
-0.28%
1M
-15.27%
YTD
-15.71%
6M
-20.75%
1Y
-14.05%
3Y*
62.41%
5Y*
35.13%
10Y*
24.81%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AESI vs. NRG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
AESI
Atlas Energy Solutions Inc
93.74%-55.28%34.96%5.56%
NRG
NRG Energy, Inc.
-15.71%78.91%78.58%61.42%

Correlation

The correlation between AESI and NRG is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.09

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.22

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 10, 2023

0.23

The correlation between AESI and NRG shifts across timeframes, from 0.09 (1 year) to 0.23 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

AESI:

$2.27B

NRG:

$27.75B

EPS

AESI:

-$0.80

NRG:

$1.21

PS Ratio

AESI:

2.13

NRG:

0.81

PB Ratio

AESI:

1.95

NRG:

6.57

Total Revenue (TTM)

AESI:

$1.06B

NRG:

$32.38B

Gross Profit (TTM)

AESI:

$87.21M

NRG:

$4.69B

EBITDA (TTM)

AESI:

$87.71M

NRG:

$2.57B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AESI vs. NRG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AESI
AESI Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
AESI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AESI Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
AESI Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
AESI Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
AESI Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank

NRG
NRG Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
NRG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NRG Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
NRG Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
NRG Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
NRG Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AESI vs. NRG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Atlas Energy Solutions Inc (AESI) and NRG Energy, Inc. (NRG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AESINRGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.06

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.49

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

0.98

+0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.01

-0.43

+1.44

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.10

-1.09

+3.19

AESI vs. NRG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AESI Sharpe Ratio is 0.75, which is higher than the NRG Sharpe Ratio of -0.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AESI and NRG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AESINRGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.75

-0.32

+1.06

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.63

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.14

0.36

-0.22

Drawdowns

AESI vs. NRG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AESI drawdown since its inception was -65.91%, smaller than the maximum NRG drawdown of -79.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AESI and NRG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AESINRGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-65.91%

-79.41%

+13.50%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-43.54%

-32.57%

-10.97%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-65.91%

-32.57%

-33.34%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.62%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-48.76%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-23.20%

-27.30%

+4.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-25.28%

-28.00%

+2.72%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

20.82%

12.87%

+7.95%

Volatility

AESI vs. NRG - Volatility Comparison

Atlas Energy Solutions Inc (AESI) and NRG Energy, Inc. (NRG) have volatilities of 14.38% and 15.07%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AESINRGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.38%

15.07%

-0.69%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

40.32%

34.35%

+5.97%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

58.77%

44.31%

+14.46%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

48.33%

39.93%

+8.40%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

48.33%

39.27%

+9.06%

Dividends

AESI vs. NRG - Dividend Comparison

AESI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.37%, which matches NRG's 1.37% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AESI
Atlas Energy Solutions Inc
1.37%7.96%4.33%4.07%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
NRG
NRG Energy, Inc.
1.37%1.11%1.81%2.92%4.40%3.02%3.20%0.30%0.30%0.42%1.92%4.93%

Financials

AESI vs. NRG - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Atlas Energy Solutions Inc and NRG Energy, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.002.00B4.00B6.00B8.00B10.00B20222023202420252026
265.58M
10.26B
(AESI) Total Revenue
(NRG) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

AESI vs. NRG - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Atlas Energy Solutions Inc and NRG Energy, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-20.0%0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%20222023202420252026
2.4%
0
Portfolio components
AESI - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Atlas Energy Solutions Inc reported a gross profit of 6.33M and revenue of 265.58M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 2.4%.

NRG - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, NRG Energy, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 10.26B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

AESI - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Atlas Energy Solutions Inc reported an operating income of -32.48M and revenue of 265.58M, resulting in an operating margin of -12.2%.

NRG - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, NRG Energy, Inc. reported an operating income of 328.00M and revenue of 10.26B, resulting in an operating margin of 3.2%.

AESI - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Atlas Energy Solutions Inc reported a net income of -47.26M and revenue of 265.58M, resulting in a net margin of -17.8%.

NRG - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, NRG Energy, Inc. reported a net income of 125.00M and revenue of 10.26B, resulting in a net margin of 1.2%.


Frequently Asked Questions


AESI and NRG have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NRG has higher volatility (15.07%) compared to AESI (14.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AESI dropped -65.91% vs NRG's -79.41%.

AESI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.74 vs -0.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AESI and NRG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer