AEMS vs. QYLD

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

AEMS (Anfield Enhanced Market ETF) and QYLD (Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - AEMS is a Derivative Income fund managed by Anfield, while QYLD is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the CBOE NASDAQ-100 Buy Write V2. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. AEMS charges 1.21%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for QYLD.

Performance

AEMS vs. QYLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Anfield Enhanced Market ETF (AEMS) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AEMS achieves a 15.80% return, which is significantly higher than QYLD's 7.88% return.

AEMS

• 1D: 0.31%
• 1M: 5.79%
• YTD: 15.80%
• 6M: 16.12%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

QYLD

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 1.40%
• YTD: 7.88%
• 6M: 9.91%
• 1Y: 23.70%
• 3Y*: 13.76%
• 5Y*: 8.43%
• 10Y*: 9.81%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AEMS vs. QYLD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
AEMS Anfield Enhanced Market ETF	15.80%	11.81%
QYLD Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF	7.88%	12.29%

Correlation

The correlation between AEMS and QYLD is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 2, 2025	0.79

Return for Risk

AEMS vs. QYLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QYLD

QYLD Risk / Return Rank: 89
QYLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
QYLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 87
QYLD Omega Ratio Rank: 92
QYLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
QYLD Martin Ratio Rank: 94

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AEMS vs. QYLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Anfield Enhanced Market ETF (AEMS) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	AEMS	QYLD	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	2.78	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.58	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.63	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	2.00	0.59	+1.41

Drawdowns

AEMS vs. QYLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AEMS drawdown since its inception was -11.37%, smaller than the maximum QYLD drawdown of -24.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AEMS and QYLD.

Drawdown Indicators

	AEMS	QYLD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-11.37%	-24.75%	+13.38%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-4.97%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-19.06%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-24.61%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-24.75%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.17%	-0.06%	-0.11%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.48%	-3.84%	+2.36%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	0.85%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	AEMS	QYLD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	1.84%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	7.12%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.11%	8.57%	+7.54%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.11%	14.70%	+1.41%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.11%	15.49%	+0.62%

AEMS vs. QYLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

AEMS has a 1.21% expense ratio, which is higher than QYLD's 0.60% expense ratio.

Dividends

AEMS vs. QYLD - Dividend Comparison

AEMS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.51%, less than QYLD's 11.46% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
AEMS Anfield Enhanced Market ETF	6.51%	7.53%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
QYLD Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF	11.46%	11.55%	12.50%	11.78%	13.75%	12.85%	11.16%	9.84%	12.44%	7.69%	9.15%	9.42%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AEMS and QYLD in my portfolio?

AEMS and QYLD have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, AEMS or QYLD?

On fees, QYLD is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, AEMS or QYLD?

QYLD is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 1.21% for AEMS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, AEMS or QYLD?

QYLD has the higher dividend yield at 11.46%, compared with 6.51% for AEMS.

What is the main difference between AEMS and QYLD?

AEMS is categorized as Derivative Income, while QYLD is Nasdaq-100. They also come from different issuers: Anfield and Global X. Their fees differ too: 1.21% for AEMS and 0.60% for QYLD.