AEMS vs. CWII
AEMS (Anfield Enhanced Market ETF) and CWII (REX CRWV Growth & Income ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. At a 0.44 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. AEMS charges 1.21%/yr vs 1.03%/yr for CWII.
Performance
AEMS vs. CWII - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AEMS achieves a 12.51% return, which is significantly lower than CWII's 13,199.78% return.
AEMS
- 1D
- -1.97%
- 1M
- -0.40%
- YTD
- 12.51%
- 6M
- 10.89%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CWII
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 10,273.16%
- YTD
- 13,199.78%
- 6M
- 11,946.90%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AEMS vs. CWII - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
AEMS Anfield Enhanced Market ETF | 12.51% | 0.37% |
CWII REX CRWV Growth & Income ETF | 13,199.78% | -45.06% |
Correlation
The correlation between AEMS and CWII is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 4, 2025 | 0.44 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AEMS vs. CWII - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Anfield Enhanced Market ETF (AEMS) and REX CRWV Growth & Income ETF (CWII). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AEMS vs. CWII - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AEMS drawdown since its inception was -11.37%, smaller than the maximum CWII drawdown of -51.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AEMS and CWII.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AEMS | CWII | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -11.37% | -51.04% | +39.67% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.01% | 0.00% | -3.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.52% | -33.26% | +31.74% |
Volatility
AEMS vs. CWII - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AEMS | CWII | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.91% | 13,701.30% | -13,684.39% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.91% | 13,701.30% | -13,684.39% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.91% | 13,701.30% | -13,684.39% |
AEMS vs. CWII - Expense Ratio Comparison
AEMS has a 1.21% expense ratio, which is higher than CWII's 1.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
AEMS vs. CWII - Dividend Comparison
AEMS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.70%, less than CWII's 123.26% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
AEMS Anfield Enhanced Market ETF | 6.70% | 7.53% |
CWII REX CRWV Growth & Income ETF | 123.26% | 6.09% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AEMS and CWII have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CWII is cheaper at 1.03% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CWII is cheaper with a 1.03% expense ratio, compared with 1.21% for AEMS.
CWII has the higher dividend yield at 123.26%, compared with 6.70% for AEMS.
They also come from different issuers: Anfield and REX Shares. Their fees differ too: 1.21% for AEMS and 1.03% for CWII.
Find the right allocation for AEMS and CWII
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer