AEMS vs. CWII

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

AEMS (Anfield Enhanced Market ETF) and CWII (REX CRWV Growth & Income ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. At a 0.46 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. AEMS charges 1.21%/yr vs 1.03%/yr for CWII.

Performance

AEMS vs. CWII - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Anfield Enhanced Market ETF (AEMS) and REX CRWV Growth & Income ETF (CWII). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AEMS achieves a 16.00% return, which is significantly lower than CWII's 44.85% return.

AEMS

• 1D: 0.82%
• 1M: 6.35%
• YTD: 16.00%
• 6M: 17.06%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CWII

• 1D: -3.09%
• 1M: 2.39%
• YTD: 44.85%
• 6M: 28.00%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AEMS vs. CWII - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
AEMS Anfield Enhanced Market ETF	16.00%	1.75%
CWII REX CRWV Growth & Income ETF	44.85%	-42.16%

Correlation

The correlation between AEMS and CWII is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 5, 2025	0.46

Return for Risk

AEMS vs. CWII - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Anfield Enhanced Market ETF (AEMS) and REX CRWV Growth & Income ETF (CWII). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	AEMS	CWII	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	2.03	-0.30	+2.34

Drawdowns

AEMS vs. CWII - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AEMS drawdown since its inception was -11.37%, smaller than the maximum CWII drawdown of -48.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AEMS and CWII.

Drawdown Indicators

	AEMS	CWII	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-11.37%	-48.46%	+37.09%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-16.22%	+16.22%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.49%	-30.62%	+29.13%

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	AEMS	CWII	Difference
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.17%	88.65%	-72.48%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.17%	88.65%	-72.48%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.17%	88.65%	-72.48%

AEMS vs. CWII - Expense Ratio Comparison

AEMS has a 1.21% expense ratio, which is higher than CWII's 1.03% expense ratio.

Dividends

AEMS vs. CWII - Dividend Comparison

AEMS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.50%, less than CWII's 19.63% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
AEMS Anfield Enhanced Market ETF	6.50%	7.53%
CWII REX CRWV Growth & Income ETF	19.63%	6.09%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AEMS and CWII in my portfolio?

AEMS and CWII have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, AEMS or CWII?

On fees, CWII is cheaper at 1.03% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, AEMS or CWII?

CWII is cheaper with a 1.03% expense ratio, compared with 1.21% for AEMS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, AEMS or CWII?

CWII has the higher dividend yield at 19.63%, compared with 6.50% for AEMS.

What is the main difference between AEMS and CWII?

They also come from different issuers: Anfield and REX Shares. Their fees differ too: 1.21% for AEMS and 1.03% for CWII.