PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AEMS vs. GOOP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AEMS vs. GOOP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Anfield Enhanced Market ETF (AEMS) and Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Google ETF (GOOP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AEMS achieves a 16.00% return, which is significantly higher than GOOP's 13.44% return.


AEMS

1D
0.82%
1M
6.35%
YTD
16.00%
6M
17.06%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

GOOP

1D
-4.43%
1M
-6.77%
YTD
13.44%
6M
13.38%
1Y
93.32%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AEMS vs. GOOP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
AEMS
Anfield Enhanced Market ETF
16.00%11.81%
GOOP
Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Google ETF
13.44%63.74%

Correlation

The correlation between AEMS and GOOP is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 2, 2025

0.49

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AEMS vs. GOOP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AEMS

GOOP
GOOP Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
GOOP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GOOP Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
GOOP Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
GOOP Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
GOOP Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AEMS vs. GOOP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Anfield Enhanced Market ETF (AEMS) and Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Google ETF (GOOP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

AEMS vs. GOOP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AEMSGOOPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.32

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.03

1.53

+0.50

Drawdowns

AEMS vs. GOOP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AEMS drawdown since its inception was -11.37%, smaller than the maximum GOOP drawdown of -27.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AEMS and GOOP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AEMSGOOPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-11.37%

-27.49%

+16.12%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-23.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-11.06%

+11.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.49%

-6.28%

+4.79%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.07%

Volatility

AEMS vs. GOOP - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AEMSGOOPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

22.63%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.17%

28.32%

-12.15%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.17%

25.92%

-9.75%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.17%

25.92%

-9.75%

AEMS vs. GOOP - Expense Ratio Comparison

AEMS has a 1.21% expense ratio, which is higher than GOOP's 0.99% expense ratio.


Dividends

AEMS vs. GOOP - Dividend Comparison

AEMS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.50%, less than GOOP's 12.13% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
AEMS
Anfield Enhanced Market ETF
6.50%7.53%0.00%0.00%
GOOP
Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Google ETF
12.13%11.79%13.73%2.06%

Frequently Asked Questions


AEMS and GOOP have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, GOOP is cheaper at 0.99% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

GOOP is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.21% for AEMS.

GOOP has the higher dividend yield at 12.13%, compared with 6.50% for AEMS.

They also come from different issuers: Anfield and Kurv. Their fees differ too: 1.21% for AEMS and 0.99% for GOOP.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AEMS and GOOP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer