PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AEMS vs. USOY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AEMS vs. USOY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Anfield Enhanced Market ETF (AEMS) and Defiance Oil Enhanced Options Income ETF (USOY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AEMS achieves a 14.93% return, which is significantly lower than USOY's 43.95% return.


AEMS

1D
0.00%
1M
1.33%
6M
11.48%
YTD
14.93%
1Y
27.15%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

USOY

1D
1.56%
1M
-3.68%
6M
39.99%
YTD
43.95%
1Y
35.94%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AEMS vs. USOY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
AEMS
Anfield Enhanced Market ETF
14.93%11.86%
USOY
Defiance Oil Enhanced Options Income ETF
43.95%-2.99%

Correlation

The correlation between AEMS and USOY is -0.19, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.19

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 2025

-0.20

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AEMS vs. USOY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AEMS
AEMS Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
AEMS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AEMS Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
AEMS Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
AEMS Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
AEMS Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank

USOY
USOY Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
USOY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USOY Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
USOY Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
USOY Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
USOY Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AEMS vs. USOY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Anfield Enhanced Market ETF (AEMS) and Defiance Oil Enhanced Options Income ETF (USOY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AEMSUSOYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.22

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.35

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.22

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.40

1.42

+0.98

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.34

4.33

+5.02

AEMS vs. USOY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AEMS Sharpe Ratio is 1.34, which is comparable to the USOY Sharpe Ratio of 1.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AEMS and USOY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AEMS vs. USOY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AEMS drawdown since its inception was -11.37%, smaller than the maximum USOY drawdown of -25.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AEMS and USOY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AEMSUSOYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-11.37%

-25.51%

+14.14%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.37%

-25.51%

+14.14%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.91%

-15.77%

+6.86%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.69%

-7.04%

+5.35%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.91%

8.33%

-5.42%

Volatility

AEMS vs. USOY - Volatility Comparison

Anfield Enhanced Market ETF (AEMS) and Defiance Oil Enhanced Options Income ETF (USOY) have volatilities of 12.53% and 12.15%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AEMSUSOYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.53%

12.15%

+0.38%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.92%

29.89%

-11.97%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.36%

32.39%

-12.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.08%

27.10%

-7.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.08%

27.10%

-7.02%

AEMS vs. USOY - Expense Ratio Comparison

AEMS has a 1.21% expense ratio, which is lower than USOY's 1.22% expense ratio.


Dividends

AEMS vs. USOY - Dividend Comparison

AEMS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 447.11%, more than USOY's 60.76% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
AEMS
Anfield Enhanced Market ETF
447.11%7.53%0.00%
USOY
Defiance Oil Enhanced Options Income ETF
60.76%104.32%48.60%

Frequently Asked Questions


AEMS and USOY have a correlation of -0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AEMS has higher volatility (12.53%) compared to USOY (12.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AEMS dropped -11.37% vs USOY's -25.51%.

On 1-year performance, USOY leads with 35.94% vs 27.15% for AEMS. On fees, AEMS is cheaper at 1.21% per year. On volatility, USOY has been the lower-risk option at 12.15%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, USOY has performed better with a 35.94% return vs 27.15%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

AEMS is cheaper with a 1.21% expense ratio, compared with 1.22% for USOY.

AEMS has the higher dividend yield at 447.11%, compared with 60.76% for USOY.

They also come from different issuers: Anfield and Defiance. Their fees differ too: 1.21% for AEMS and 1.22% for USOY.

AEMS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.34 vs 1.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AEMS and USOY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer