AEMS vs. GOOW

Last updated Jul 3, 2026

AEMS (Anfield Enhanced Market ETF) and GOOW (Roundhill GOOGL WeeklyPay™ ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. At a 0.50 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. AEMS charges 1.21%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for GOOW.

Performance

AEMS vs. GOOW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Anfield Enhanced Market ETF (AEMS) and Roundhill GOOGL WeeklyPay™ ETF (GOOW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AEMS achieves a 26.17% return, which is significantly higher than GOOW's 15.66% return.

AEMS

• 1D: 7.99%
• 1M: 8.77%
• 6M: 26.17%
• YTD: 26.17%
• 1Y: 40.50%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

GOOW

• 1D: -0.20%
• 1M: -0.69%
• 6M: 15.66%
• YTD: 15.66%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AEMS vs. GOOW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
AEMS Anfield Enhanced Market ETF	26.17%	9.55%
GOOW Roundhill GOOGL WeeklyPay™ ETF	15.66%	71.16%

Correlation

The correlation between AEMS and GOOW is 0.50, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 24, 2025	0.50

Return for Risk

AEMS vs. GOOW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AEMS

AEMS Risk / Return Rank: 85
AEMS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 82
AEMS Sortino Ratio Rank: 86
AEMS Omega Ratio Rank: 84
AEMS Calmar Ratio Rank: 82
AEMS Martin Ratio Rank: 89

GOOW

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AEMS vs. GOOW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Anfield Enhanced Market ETF (AEMS) and Roundhill GOOGL WeeklyPay™ ETF (GOOW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	AEMS	GOOW	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.16	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.17	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.41	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.58	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	16.08	—	—

Drawdowns

AEMS vs. GOOW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AEMS drawdown since its inception was -11.37%, smaller than the maximum GOOW drawdown of -24.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AEMS and GOOW.

Drawdown Indicators

	AEMS	GOOW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-11.37%	-24.88%	+13.51%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.37%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-13.02%	+13.02%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.49%	-5.54%	+4.05%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.53%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	AEMS	GOOW	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.66%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	16.09%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.82%	37.94%	-19.12%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.79%	37.94%	-19.15%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.79%	37.94%	-19.15%

AEMS vs. GOOW - Expense Ratio Comparison

AEMS has a 1.21% expense ratio, which is higher than GOOW's 0.99% expense ratio.

Dividends

AEMS vs. GOOW - Dividend Comparison

AEMS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 407.25%, more than GOOW's 38.77% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
AEMS Anfield Enhanced Market ETF	407.25%	7.53%
GOOW Roundhill GOOGL WeeklyPay™ ETF	38.77%	19.77%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AEMS and GOOW in my portfolio?

AEMS and GOOW have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, AEMS or GOOW?

On fees, GOOW is cheaper at 0.99% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, AEMS or GOOW?

GOOW is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.21% for AEMS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, AEMS or GOOW?

AEMS has the higher dividend yield at 407.25%, compared with 38.77% for GOOW.

What is the main difference between AEMS and GOOW?

They also come from different issuers: Anfield and Roundhill. Their fees differ too: 1.21% for AEMS and 0.99% for GOOW.