AEMS vs. AMDW
AEMS (Anfield Enhanced Market ETF) and AMDW (Roundhill AMD WeeklyPay ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. A 0.56 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. AEMS charges 1.21%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for AMDW.
Performance
AEMS vs. AMDW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AEMS achieves a 15.80% return, which is significantly lower than AMDW's 181.57% return.
AEMS
- 1D
- 0.31%
- 1M
- 5.79%
- YTD
- 15.80%
- 6M
- 16.12%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AMDW
- 1D
- -3.70%
- 1M
- 58.72%
- YTD
- 181.57%
- 6M
- 177.88%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AEMS vs. AMDW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
AEMS Anfield Enhanced Market ETF | 15.80% | 9.44% |
AMDW Roundhill AMD WeeklyPay ETF | 181.57% | 34.24% |
Correlation
The correlation between AEMS and AMDW is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 25, 2025 | 0.56 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AEMS vs. AMDW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Anfield Enhanced Market ETF (AEMS) and Roundhill AMD WeeklyPay ETF (AMDW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AEMS | AMDW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 2.00 | 4.53 | -2.53 |
Drawdowns
AEMS vs. AMDW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AEMS drawdown since its inception was -11.37%, smaller than the maximum AMDW drawdown of -34.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AEMS and AMDW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AEMS | AMDW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -11.37% | -34.64% | +23.27% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.17% | -3.70% | +3.53% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.48% | -14.61% | +13.13% |
Volatility
AEMS vs. AMDW - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AEMS | AMDW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.11% | 81.51% | -65.40% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.11% | 81.51% | -65.40% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.11% | 81.51% | -65.40% |
AEMS vs. AMDW - Expense Ratio Comparison
AEMS has a 1.21% expense ratio, which is higher than AMDW's 0.99% expense ratio.
Dividends
AEMS vs. AMDW - Dividend Comparison
AEMS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.51%, less than AMDW's 30.10% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
AEMS Anfield Enhanced Market ETF | 6.51% | 7.53% |
AMDW Roundhill AMD WeeklyPay ETF | 30.10% | 34.78% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AEMS and AMDW have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, AMDW is cheaper at 0.99% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
AMDW is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.21% for AEMS.
AMDW has the higher dividend yield at 30.10%, compared with 6.51% for AEMS.
They also come from different issuers: Anfield and Roundhill. Their fees differ too: 1.21% for AEMS and 0.99% for AMDW.
Find the right allocation for AEMS and AMDW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer