PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ADM vs. VGT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ADM vs. VGT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Archer-Daniels-Midland Company (ADM) and Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ADM achieves a 48.38% return, which is significantly higher than VGT's 31.64% return. Over the past 10 years, ADM has underperformed VGT with an annualized return of 9.99%, while VGT has yielded a comparatively higher 25.78% annualized return.


ADM

1D
2.00%
1M
11.01%
YTD
48.38%
6M
42.65%
1Y
83.50%
3Y*
8.88%
5Y*
7.09%
10Y*
9.99%

VGT

1D
-1.48%
1M
18.07%
YTD
31.64%
6M
30.51%
1Y
60.15%
3Y*
33.48%
5Y*
22.23%
10Y*
25.78%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ADM vs. VGT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ADM
Archer-Daniels-Midland Company
48.38%18.24%-27.52%-20.42%39.98%37.33%12.44%17.10%5.28%-9.48%
VGT
Vanguard Information Technology ETF
31.64%21.77%29.30%52.66%-29.70%30.45%46.04%48.62%2.46%37.08%

Correlation

The correlation between ADM and VGT is -0.10, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.10

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.00

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.11

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.23

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2004

0.36

The correlation between ADM and VGT shifts across timeframes, from -0.10 (1 year) to 0.36 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ADM vs. VGT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ADM
ADM Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
ADM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ADM Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
ADM Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
ADM Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
ADM Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank

VGT
VGT Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
VGT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VGT Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
VGT Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
VGT Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
VGT Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ADM vs. VGT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Archer-Daniels-Midland Company (ADM) and Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ADMVGTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.18

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.36

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.48

1.47

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

6.57

3.69

+2.88

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

18.32

11.77

+6.55

ADM vs. VGT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ADM Sharpe Ratio is 3.12, which is comparable to the VGT Sharpe Ratio of 2.95. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ADM and VGT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ADMVGTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.12

2.95

+0.18

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.25

0.89

-0.64

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.37

1.05

-0.68

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.26

0.68

-0.42

Drawdowns

ADM vs. VGT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ADM drawdown since its inception was -68.01%, which is greater than VGT's maximum drawdown of -54.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ADM and VGT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ADMVGTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-68.01%

-54.63%

-13.38%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.79%

-16.40%

+3.61%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-49.22%

-27.23%

-21.99%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-54.14%

-35.07%

-19.07%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-54.14%

-35.07%

-19.07%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.80%

-1.48%

-2.32%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-21.60%

-7.95%

-13.65%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.57%

5.13%

-0.56%

Volatility

ADM vs. VGT - Volatility Comparison

Archer-Daniels-Midland Company (ADM) has a higher volatility of 7.97% compared to Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT) at 6.39%. This indicates that ADM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VGT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ADMVGTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.97%

6.39%

+1.58%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.05%

16.07%

+2.98%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

26.97%

20.57%

+6.40%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

28.21%

25.18%

+3.03%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.94%

24.60%

+2.34%

Dividends

ADM vs. VGT - Dividend Comparison

ADM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.45%, more than VGT's 0.31% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ADM
Archer-Daniels-Midland Company
2.45%3.55%3.96%2.49%1.72%2.19%2.86%3.02%3.27%3.19%2.63%3.05%
VGT
Vanguard Information Technology ETF
0.31%0.40%0.60%0.65%0.91%0.64%0.82%1.11%1.29%0.99%1.31%1.28%

Frequently Asked Questions


ADM and VGT have a correlation of -0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ADM has higher volatility (7.97%) compared to VGT (6.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ADM dropped -68.01% vs VGT's -54.63%.

ADM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.12 vs 2.95), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ADM and VGT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer