PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ADM vs. CB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

ADM vs. CB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Archer-Daniels-Midland Company (ADM) and Chubb Limited (CB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ADM achieves a 41.55% return, which is significantly higher than CB's 5.77% return. Over the past 10 years, ADM has underperformed CB with an annualized return of 9.94%, while CB has yielded a comparatively higher 12.26% annualized return.


ADM

1D
1.70%
1M
0.46%
YTD
41.55%
6M
35.61%
1Y
59.17%
3Y*
6.06%
5Y*
6.96%
10Y*
9.94%

CB

1D
0.38%
1M
1.55%
YTD
5.77%
6M
7.02%
1Y
15.88%
3Y*
21.39%
5Y*
16.27%
10Y*
12.26%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ADM vs. CB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ADM
Archer-Daniels-Midland Company
41.55%18.24%-27.52%-20.42%39.98%37.33%12.44%17.10%5.28%-9.48%
CB
Chubb Limited
5.77%14.46%23.89%4.20%15.97%27.85%1.41%22.94%-9.63%12.82%

Correlation

The correlation between ADM and CB is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.06

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.23

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.34

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.39

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 24, 1993

0.32

Over the past year, the correlation between ADM and CB has dropped to 0.06 - well below their long-term average of 0.32, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

ADM:

$38.84B

CB:

$129.48B

EPS

ADM:

$2.23

CB:

$28.35

PE Ratio

ADM:

35.93

CB:

11.58

PS Ratio

ADM:

0.48

CB:

2.72

PB Ratio

ADM:

1.70

CB:

1.62

Total Revenue (TTM)

ADM:

$80.61B

CB:

$48.15B

Gross Profit (TTM)

ADM:

$4.70B

CB:

$17.01B

EBITDA (TTM)

ADM:

$3.48B

CB:

$12.22B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ADM vs. CB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ADM
ADM Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
ADM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ADM Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
ADM Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
ADM Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
ADM Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

CB
CB Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
CB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CB Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
CB Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
CB Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
CB Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ADM vs. CB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Archer-Daniels-Midland Company (ADM) and Chubb Limited (CB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ADMCBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.59

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.92

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.17

+0.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.24

1.64

+3.60

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.45

3.73

+10.72

ADM vs. CB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ADM Sharpe Ratio is 2.46, which is higher than the CB Sharpe Ratio of 0.87. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ADM and CB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ADM vs. CB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ADM drawdown since its inception was -68.01%, which is greater than CB's maximum drawdown of -50.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ADM and CB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ADMCBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-68.01%

-50.99%

-17.02%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.79%

-9.36%

-3.43%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-49.22%

-14.35%

-34.87%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-54.14%

-19.26%

-34.88%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-54.14%

-42.59%

-11.55%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.23%

-3.68%

-4.55%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-21.59%

-10.68%

-10.91%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.63%

4.11%

+0.52%

Volatility

ADM vs. CB - Volatility Comparison

Archer-Daniels-Midland Company (ADM) has a higher volatility of 7.74% compared to Chubb Limited (CB) at 6.08%. This indicates that ADM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ADMCBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.74%

6.08%

+1.66%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.56%

13.12%

+6.44%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.30%

17.67%

+9.63%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

28.26%

20.33%

+7.93%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.96%

23.69%

+3.27%

Dividends

ADM vs. CB - Dividend Comparison

ADM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.57%, more than CB's 1.49% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ADM
Archer-Daniels-Midland Company
2.57%3.55%3.96%2.49%1.72%2.19%2.86%3.02%3.27%3.19%2.63%3.05%
CB
Chubb Limited
1.20%1.22%1.30%1.51%1.49%1.65%2.01%1.91%2.24%1.93%2.07%4.23%

Financials

ADM vs. CB - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Archer-Daniels-Midland Company and Chubb Limited. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.005.00B10.00B15.00B20.00B25.00B20222023202420252026
20.49B
1.88B
(ADM) Total Revenue
(CB) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


ADM and CB have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ADM has higher volatility (7.74%) compared to CB (6.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ADM dropped -68.01% vs CB's -50.99%.

ADM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.46 vs 0.87), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ADM and CB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer