PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ADIV vs. DBEF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ADIV vs. DBEF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SmartETFs Asia Pacific Dividend Builder ETF (ADIV) and Xtrackers MSCI EAFE Hedged Equity ETF (DBEF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ADIV achieves a 4.50% return, which is significantly lower than DBEF's 9.52% return.


ADIV

1D
0.43%
1M
-2.41%
YTD
4.50%
6M
4.87%
1Y
14.36%
3Y*
15.97%
5Y*
5.91%
10Y*

DBEF

1D
0.82%
1M
1.44%
YTD
9.52%
6M
11.55%
1Y
22.84%
3Y*
17.58%
5Y*
12.96%
10Y*
12.28%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ADIV vs. DBEF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
ADIV
SmartETFs Asia Pacific Dividend Builder ETF
4.50%21.86%14.47%12.28%-18.00%1.50%
DBEF
Xtrackers MSCI EAFE Hedged Equity ETF
9.52%23.16%13.40%20.15%-5.13%10.53%

Correlation

The correlation between ADIV and DBEF is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.64

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.61

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 30, 2021

0.65

The correlation between ADIV and DBEF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.61 to 0.65 - a consistent structural relationship.

ADIV vs. DBEF - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ADIV
DBEF

Financial Services

32.4%
24.6%

Technology

25.5%
10.3%

Consumer Cyclical

16.3%
7.5%

Real Estate

7.9%
1.9%

Healthcare

5.6%
10.5%

Consumer Defensive

4.7%
6.8%

Communication Services

2.7%
4.5%

Utilities

2.5%
3.9%

Industrials

2.4%
19.9%

Basic Materials

-

5.9%

Energy

-

4.1%

Financial Services

ADIV
32.4%
DBEF
24.6%

Technology

ADIV
25.5%
DBEF
10.3%

Consumer Cyclical

ADIV
16.3%
DBEF
7.5%

Real Estate

ADIV
7.9%
DBEF
1.9%

Healthcare

ADIV
5.6%
DBEF
10.5%

Consumer Defensive

ADIV
4.7%
DBEF
6.8%

Communication Services

ADIV
2.7%
DBEF
4.5%

Utilities

ADIV
2.5%
DBEF
3.9%

Industrials

ADIV
2.4%
DBEF
19.9%

Basic Materials

ADIV

-

DBEF
5.9%

Energy

ADIV

-

DBEF
4.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ADIV vs. DBEF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ADIV
ADIV Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
ADIV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ADIV Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
ADIV Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
ADIV Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
ADIV Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank

DBEF
DBEF Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
DBEF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DBEF Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
DBEF Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
DBEF Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
DBEF Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ADIV vs. DBEF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SmartETFs Asia Pacific Dividend Builder ETF (ADIV) and Xtrackers MSCI EAFE Hedged Equity ETF (DBEF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ADIVDBEFDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.78

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.06

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.34

-0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.42

2.44

-1.02

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.66

10.24

-5.58

ADIV vs. DBEF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ADIV Sharpe Ratio is 1.04, which is lower than the DBEF Sharpe Ratio of 1.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ADIV and DBEF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ADIVDBEFDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.04

1.83

-0.78

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.36

0.95

-0.59

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.78

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.38

0.55

-0.17

Drawdowns

ADIV vs. DBEF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ADIV drawdown since its inception was -31.55%, roughly equal to the maximum DBEF drawdown of -32.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ADIV and DBEF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ADIVDBEFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.55%

-32.46%

+0.91%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.15%

-9.41%

-0.74%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.53%

-14.62%

-3.91%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.55%

-14.95%

-16.60%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.46%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.40%

-1.26%

-3.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.44%

-4.73%

-3.71%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.09%

2.24%

+0.85%

Volatility

ADIV vs. DBEF - Volatility Comparison

SmartETFs Asia Pacific Dividend Builder ETF (ADIV) has a higher volatility of 5.13% compared to Xtrackers MSCI EAFE Hedged Equity ETF (DBEF) at 3.60%. This indicates that ADIV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DBEF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ADIVDBEFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.13%

3.60%

+1.53%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.02%

10.41%

+0.61%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.87%

12.59%

+1.28%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.54%

13.78%

+2.76%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.41%

15.81%

+0.60%

ADIV vs. DBEF - Expense Ratio Comparison

ADIV has a 0.78% expense ratio, which is higher than DBEF's 0.36% expense ratio.


Dividends

ADIV vs. DBEF - Dividend Comparison

ADIV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.88%, less than DBEF's 5.07% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ADIV
SmartETFs Asia Pacific Dividend Builder ETF
2.88%2.77%4.83%4.55%2.98%13.85%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
DBEF
Xtrackers MSCI EAFE Hedged Equity ETF
5.07%5.55%1.29%4.46%15.85%2.28%2.41%3.03%3.22%2.98%2.55%3.70%

Frequently Asked Questions


ADIV and DBEF have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ADIV has higher volatility (5.13%) compared to DBEF (3.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ADIV dropped -31.55% vs DBEF's -32.46%.

On 5-year performance, DBEF leads with 12.96% vs 5.91% for ADIV. On fees, DBEF is cheaper at 0.36% per year. On volatility, DBEF has been the lower-risk option at 3.60%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, DBEF has performed better with a 12.96% return vs 5.91%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DBEF is cheaper with a 0.36% expense ratio, compared with 0.78% for ADIV.

DBEF has the higher dividend yield at 5.07%, compared with 2.88% for ADIV.

ADIV is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while DBEF is Hedge Fund. They also come from different issuers: Guinness Atkinson Asset Management and DWS. Their fees differ too: 0.78% for ADIV and 0.36% for DBEF.

DBEF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.83 vs 1.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ADIV and DBEF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer