ADIV vs. FPA
Compare and contrast key facts about SmartETFs Asia Pacific Dividend Builder ETF (ADIV) and First Trust Asia Pacific ex-Japan AlphaDEX Fund (FPA).
ADIV and FPA are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. ADIV is an actively managed fund by Guinness Atkinson Asset Management. It was launched on Mar 29, 2021. FPA is a passively managed fund by First Trust that tracks the performance of the NASDAQ AlphaDEX Asia Pacific Ex-Japan Index. It was launched on Apr 18, 2011.
Performance
ADIV vs. FPA - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
ADIV vs. FPA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ADIV SmartETFs Asia Pacific Dividend Builder ETF | -2.19% | 21.86% | 14.47% | 12.28% | -18.00% | 1.50% |
FPA First Trust Asia Pacific ex-Japan AlphaDEX Fund | 17.42% | 43.16% | 3.95% | 9.97% | -14.55% | -3.44% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ADIV achieves a -2.19% return, which is significantly lower than FPA's 17.42% return.
ADIV
- 1D
- 1.75%
- 1M
- -6.80%
- YTD
- -2.19%
- 6M
- -1.25%
- 1Y
- 17.88%
- 3Y*
- 13.53%
- 5Y*
- 4.87%
- 10Y*
- —
FPA
- 1D
- 3.37%
- 1M
- -12.20%
- YTD
- 17.42%
- 6M
- 20.56%
- 1Y
- 61.12%
- 3Y*
- 21.98%
- 5Y*
- 9.33%
- 10Y*
- 8.13%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
ADIV vs. FPA - Expense Ratio Comparison
ADIV has a 0.78% expense ratio, which is lower than FPA's 0.80% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
ADIV vs. FPA — Risk / Return Rank
ADIV
FPA
ADIV vs. FPA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SmartETFs Asia Pacific Dividend Builder ETF (ADIV) and First Trust Asia Pacific ex-Japan AlphaDEX Fund (FPA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ADIV | FPA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.05 | 2.40 | -1.35 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.54 | 3.14 | -1.60 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.44 | -0.21 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.25 | 3.96 | -2.71 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.47 | 16.04 | -10.56 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ADIV | FPA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.05 | 2.40 | -1.35 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.30 | 0.41 | -0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.37 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.30 | 0.26 | +0.05 |
Correlation
The correlation between ADIV and FPA is 0.61, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
ADIV vs. FPA - Dividend Comparison
ADIV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.08%, less than FPA's 4.54% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ADIV SmartETFs Asia Pacific Dividend Builder ETF | 3.08% | 2.77% | 4.83% | 4.55% | 2.98% | 13.85% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FPA First Trust Asia Pacific ex-Japan AlphaDEX Fund | 4.54% | 4.71% | 3.40% | 3.02% | 4.22% | 5.12% | 1.59% | 3.90% | 2.81% | 3.15% | 2.42% | 1.74% |
Drawdowns
ADIV vs. FPA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ADIV drawdown since its inception was -31.55%, smaller than the maximum FPA drawdown of -52.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ADIV and FPA.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| ADIV | FPA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.55% | -52.91% | +21.36% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.51% | -15.37% | +1.86% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.55% | -35.36% | +3.81% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -52.91% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.41% | -12.52% | +4.11% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.64% | -13.60% | +4.96% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.10% | 3.80% | -0.70% |
Volatility
ADIV vs. FPA - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SmartETFs Asia Pacific Dividend Builder ETF (ADIV) is 6.43%, while First Trust Asia Pacific ex-Japan AlphaDEX Fund (FPA) has a volatility of 12.28%. This indicates that ADIV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FPA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| ADIV | FPA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.43% | 12.28% | -5.85% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.32% | 17.57% | -7.25% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.12% | 25.56% | -8.44% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.44% | 23.12% | -6.68% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.43% | 21.91% | -5.48% |