ADIV vs. CN
Compare and contrast key facts about SmartETFs Asia Pacific Dividend Builder ETF (ADIV) and Xtrackers MSCI All China Equity ETF (CN).
ADIV and CN are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. ADIV is an actively managed fund by Guinness Atkinson Asset Management. It was launched on Mar 29, 2021. CN is a passively managed fund by Deutsche Bank that tracks the performance of the MSCI China All Shares. It was launched on Apr 30, 2014.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: ADIV or CN.
Key characteristics
| ADIV | CN | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | -2.80% | -69.05% |
| 1Y Return | 3.33% | -38.10% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | -3.77% | -13.71% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 0.16 | -0.23 |
| Daily Std Dev | 14.41% | 147.07% |
| Max Drawdown | -31.55% | -99.11% |
| Current Drawdown | -12.03% | -92.26% |
Correlation
The correlation between ADIV and CN is -0.03. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.
Performance
ADIV vs. CN - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, ADIV achieves a -2.80% return, which is significantly higher than CN's -69.05% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
ADIV vs. CN - Expense Ratio Comparison
Risk-Adjusted Performance
ADIV vs. CN - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SmartETFs Asia Pacific Dividend Builder ETF (ADIV) and Xtrackers MSCI All China Equity ETF (CN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
ADIV vs. CN - Dividend Comparison
ADIV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.92%, less than CN's 18,991.20% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ADIV SmartETFs Asia Pacific Dividend Builder ETF | 4.92% | 4.55% | 2.98% | 13.85% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
CN Xtrackers MSCI All China Equity ETF | 18,991.20% | 235.17% | 61.66% | 530.55% | 159.04% | 3,205.11% | 989.83% | 318.27% | 2,808.84% | 4,168.13% | 888.58% |
Drawdowns
ADIV vs. CN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ADIV drawdown since its inception was -31.55%, smaller than the maximum CN drawdown of -99.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ADIV and CN. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
ADIV vs. CN - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SmartETFs Asia Pacific Dividend Builder ETF (ADIV) is 3.64%, while Xtrackers MSCI All China Equity ETF (CN) has a volatility of 43.77%. This indicates that ADIV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.