PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
ADIV vs. CN
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between ADIV and CN is 0.62, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


-0.50.00.51.00.6

Performance

ADIV vs. CN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SmartETFs Asia Pacific Dividend Builder ETF (ADIV) and Xtrackers MSCI All China Equity ETF (CN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

0.00%5.00%10.00%15.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
10.57%
0
ADIV
CN

Key characteristics

Returns By Period


ADIV

YTD

4.11%

1M

4.28%

6M

10.58%

1Y

19.21%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

CN

YTD

N/A

1M

N/A

6M

N/A

1Y

N/A

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


ADIV vs. CN - Expense Ratio Comparison

ADIV has a 0.78% expense ratio, which is higher than CN's 0.50% expense ratio.


ADIV
SmartETFs Asia Pacific Dividend Builder ETF
Expense ratio chart for ADIV: current value at 0.78% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.78%
Expense ratio chart for CN: current value at 0.50% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.50%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

ADIV vs. CN — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ADIV
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of ADIV is 5454
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of ADIV is 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of ADIV is 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of ADIV is 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of ADIV is 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of ADIV is 4646
Martin Ratio Rank

CN
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of CN is 1313
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of CN is 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of CN is 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of CN is 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of CN is 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of CN is 88
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

ADIV vs. CN - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SmartETFs Asia Pacific Dividend Builder ETF (ADIV) and Xtrackers MSCI All China Equity ETF (CN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for ADIV, currently valued at 1.32, compared to the broader market0.002.004.001.320.90
The chart of Sortino ratio for ADIV, currently valued at 1.92, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.001.921.44
The chart of Omega ratio for ADIV, currently valued at 1.25, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.503.001.251.66
The chart of Calmar ratio for ADIV, currently valued at 1.73, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.001.730.09
The chart of Martin ratio for ADIV, currently valued at 4.55, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.004.552.55
ADIV
CN


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.000.501.001.502.00SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
1.32
0.90
ADIV
CN

Dividends

ADIV vs. CN - Dividend Comparison

ADIV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.64%, while CN has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
ADIV
SmartETFs Asia Pacific Dividend Builder ETF
4.64%4.83%4.55%2.98%13.85%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
CN
Xtrackers MSCI All China Equity ETF
100.13%100.13%4.04%0.21%2.00%0.78%4.18%2.09%0.81%9.12%4.03%1.15%

Drawdowns

ADIV vs. CN - Drawdown Comparison


-50.00%-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
-3.89%
-46.63%
ADIV
CN

Volatility

ADIV vs. CN - Volatility Comparison

SmartETFs Asia Pacific Dividend Builder ETF (ADIV) has a higher volatility of 2.92% compared to Xtrackers MSCI All China Equity ETF (CN) at 0.00%. This indicates that ADIV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


0.00%2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
2.92%
0
ADIV
CN
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab