PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ADIV vs. BKEM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ADIV vs. BKEM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SmartETFs Asia Pacific Dividend Builder ETF (ADIV) and BNY Mellon Emerging Markets Equity ETF (BKEM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ADIV achieves a 9.55% return, which is significantly lower than BKEM's 19.49% return.


ADIV

1D
-0.96%
1M
6.05%
6M
6.89%
YTD
9.55%
1Y
14.46%
3Y*
16.03%
5Y*
7.69%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
6.88%

BKEM

1D
1.00%
1M
-2.28%
6M
10.09%
YTD
19.49%
1Y
36.07%
3Y*
18.26%
5Y*
7.27%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
12.53%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$158.48K$98.50K$105.95K
$479.81K$325.26K$242.87K

ADIV vs. BKEM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
ADIV
SmartETFs Asia Pacific Dividend Builder ETF
9.55%21.86%14.47%12.28%-18.00%1.41%
BKEM
BNY Mellon Emerging Markets Equity ETF
19.49%30.55%7.53%8.68%-19.43%-6.72%

Correlation

The correlation between ADIV and BKEM is 0.72, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.72

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.81

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.84

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 29, 2021

0.84

The correlation between ADIV and BKEM shifts across timeframes, from 0.72 (1 year) to 0.84 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

ADIV vs. BKEM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ADIV
BKEM

Financial Services

32.2%
17.5%

Technology

25.8%
44.5%

Consumer Cyclical

15.9%
7.7%

Real Estate

8.1%
1.1%

Healthcare

5.2%
2.7%

Consumer Defensive

4.8%
2.6%

Communication Services

3.5%
5.8%

Industrials

2.5%
7.6%

Utilities

2.0%
2.0%

Basic Materials

-

5.4%

Energy

-

3.1%

Financial Services

ADIV
32.2%
BKEM
17.5%

Technology

ADIV
25.8%
BKEM
44.5%

Consumer Cyclical

ADIV
15.9%
BKEM
7.7%

Real Estate

ADIV
8.1%
BKEM
1.1%

Healthcare

ADIV
5.2%
BKEM
2.7%

Consumer Defensive

ADIV
4.8%
BKEM
2.6%

Communication Services

ADIV
3.5%
BKEM
5.8%

Industrials

ADIV
2.5%
BKEM
7.6%

Utilities

ADIV
2.0%
BKEM
2.0%

Basic Materials

ADIV

-

BKEM
5.4%

Energy

ADIV

-

BKEM
3.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ADIV vs. BKEM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

ADIV
ADIV Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
ADIV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ADIV Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
ADIV Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
ADIV Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
ADIV Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank

BKEM
BKEM Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
BKEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BKEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
BKEM Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
BKEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
BKEM Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

ADIV vs. BKEM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SmartETFs Asia Pacific Dividend Builder ETF (ADIV) and BNY Mellon Emerging Markets Equity ETF (BKEM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ADIVBKEMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.50

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.56

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.27

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.37

2.54

-1.17

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.24

7.83

-3.60

ADIV vs. BKEM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ADIV Sharpe Ratio is 0.98, which is lower than the BKEM Sharpe Ratio of 1.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ADIV and BKEM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ADIV vs. BKEM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ADIV drawdown since its inception was -31.55%, smaller than the maximum BKEM drawdown of -39.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ADIV and BKEM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ADIVBKEMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.55%

-39.48%

+7.93%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.15%

-13.91%

+3.76%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.53%

-18.38%

-0.15%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.55%

-33.28%

+1.73%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.96%

-9.52%

+8.56%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.27%

-15.76%

+7.49%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.27%

4.49%

-1.22%

Volatility

ADIV vs. BKEM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SmartETFs Asia Pacific Dividend Builder ETF (ADIV) is 3.87%, while BNY Mellon Emerging Markets Equity ETF (BKEM) has a volatility of 9.22%. This indicates that ADIV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BKEM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ADIVBKEMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.87%

9.22%

-5.35%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.67%

21.85%

-10.18%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.23%

23.85%

-9.62%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.61%

19.61%

-3.00%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.35%

19.76%

-3.41%

ADIV vs. BKEM - Expense Ratio Comparison

ADIV has a 0.78% expense ratio, which is higher than BKEM's 0.11% expense ratio.


Dividends

ADIV vs. BKEM - Dividend Comparison

ADIV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.87%, more than BKEM's 1.96% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
ADIV
SmartETFs Asia Pacific Dividend Builder ETF
2.87%2.77%4.83%4.55%2.98%13.85%0.00%
BKEM
BNY Mellon Emerging Markets Equity ETF
1.96%2.25%2.76%3.02%3.15%2.22%1.78%

Frequently Asked Questions


ADIV and BKEM have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BKEM has higher volatility (9.22%) compared to ADIV (3.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ADIV dropped -31.55% vs BKEM's -39.48%.

On 5-year performance, ADIV leads with 7.69% vs 7.27% for BKEM. On fees, BKEM is cheaper at 0.11% per year. On volatility, ADIV has been the lower-risk option at 3.87%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, ADIV has performed better with a 7.69% return vs 7.27%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BKEM is cheaper with a 0.11% expense ratio, compared with 0.78% for ADIV.

ADIV has the higher dividend yield at 2.87%, compared with 1.96% for BKEM.

ADIV is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while BKEM is Emerging Markets Equities. They also come from different issuers: Guinness Atkinson and BNY Mellon. Their fees differ too: 0.78% for ADIV and 0.11% for BKEM.

BKEM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.48 vs 0.98), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ADIV and BKEM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer